If you boycotted all wage theft businesses, you’d starve

Via Domain:

Coles has sought to quell concerns about modern slavery within the supermarket’s supply chains via a new partnership with some of Australia’s largest unions, but shareholder groups remain unconvinced.

The retailer has joined forces with the Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees Association (SDA), the Transport Workers Union (TWU) and the Australian Workers Union (AWU) to strike a new deal promoting ethical practices across the company’s supply chain.

Chief executive Steven Cain said the agreement would focus on labour hire organisations, which a number of Coles suppliers use to staff their farms.

…In September, activist shareholder group the Australasian Centre for Corporate Responsibility (ACCR) filed a shareholder resolution pushing Coles to embed a union voice within its supply chains, claiming the company has an over-reliance on third-party audits.

In correspondence released today, the shareholder group rubbished Coles’ agreement, saying it does not initially appear to address its concerns and asked the supermarket for more detail on the nature of the accord.

The ACCR says at first glance the agreement fails to address the company’s reliance on third-party audits and doesn’t cover the “immediate and urgent” risk of illegal workers across Coles’ suppliers.

If you were a consumer concerned about the destruction of Australian wages you’d pretty much have to starve.

Coles is at it. Woolies is at it. Just about every restaurant and cafe is at it.

Pollies have bleated about making Australia a high-end smart econonmy for years, to add vlaue and drive income gains. But while doing so they have in reality been transforming Australia into a low wage economic zone via the route of mass immigration.

It is shaping as a class war of unparalleled viciousness since the Rum Rebellion.

It is structural. It is deliberate. It is driven by the mass immigration growth model which neither controls nor cares about these outcomes. It is loved by the Right because it delivers fat rentiers easier profits. It is loved by the Left because it’s not racist. It is loved by the media because it drives property listings. It is loved by Treasury because more warm bodies boost the Budget. It is loved by the RBA because it doesn’t have to account for its housing bubble.

Australia’s migrant slavery economy is the core of broader weak wages growth but that doesn’t matter either.  The macro-economic enabler is running mass immigration into material economic slack for the first time ever:

What does macro-economics 101 tell us happens when a perpetual supply shock lands on weak demand? Prices fall.

Piles of micr0-economic evidence also supports the contention that the mass immigration model does not do wage rises:

  • For years we have seen Dominos, Caltex, 7-Eleven, Woolworths and many other fast food franchises busted for rorting migrant labour.
  • The issue culminated in 2016 when the Senate Education and Employment References Committee released a scathing report entitled A National Disgrace: The Exploitation of Temporary Work Visa Holders, which documented systemic abuses of Australia’s temporary visa system for foreign workers.
  • Mid 2017, ABC’s 7.30 Report ran a disturbing expose on the modern day slavery occurring across Australia.
  • Meanwhile, Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO), Natalie James, told Fairfax that people on visas continue to be exploited at an alarming rate, particularly those with limited English-language skills. It was also revealed that foreign workers are involved in more than three-quarters of legal cases initiated by the FWO against unscrupulous employers.
  • Then The ABC reported that Australia’s horticulture industry is at the centre of yet another migrant slave scandal, according to an Australian Parliamentary Inquiry into the issue.
  • The same Parliamentary Inquiry was told by an undercover Malaysian journalist that foreign workers in Victoria were “brainwashed” and trapped in debt to keep them on farms.
  • UNSW Sydney and UTS survey painted the most damning picture of all, reporting that wages theft is endemic among international students, backpackers and other temporary migrants.
  • A few months ago, Fair Work warned that most of Western Sydney had become a virtual special economic zone in which two-thirds of businesses were underpaying workers, with the worst offenders being high-migrant areas.
  • Dr Bob Birrell from the Australian Population Research Institute latest released a report, based on 2016 Census data, revealed that most recently arrived skilled migrants (i.e. arrived between 2011 and 2016) cannot find professional jobs, with only 24% of skilled migrants from Non-English-Speaking-Countries (who comprise 84% of the total skilled migrant intake) employed as professionals as of 2016, compared with 50% of skilled migrants from Main English-Speaking-Countries and 58% of the same aged Australian-born graduates. These results accord with a survey from the Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre, which found that 53% of skilled migrants in Western Australia said they are working in lower skilled jobs than before they arrived, with underemployment also rife.
  • The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) latest Characteristics of Recent Migrants reportrevealed that migrants have generally worse labour market outcomes than the Australian born population, with recent migrants and temporary residents having an unemployment rate of 7.4% versus 5.4% for the Australian born population, and lower labour force participation (69.8%) than the Australian born population (70.2%).
  • ABC Radio recently highlighted the absurdity of Australia’s ‘skilled’ migration program in which skilled migrants have grown increasingly frustrated at not being able to gain work in Australia despite leaving their homelands to fill so-called ‘skills shortages’. As a result, they are now demanding that taxpayers provide government-sponsored internships to help skilled migrants gain local experience, and a chance to work in their chosen field.
  • In early 2018 the senate launched the”The operation and effectiveness of the Franchising Code of Conduct” owing in part to systematic abuse of migrant labour.
  • Then there is new was research from the University of Sydney documenting the complete corruption of the temporary visas system, and arguing that Australia running a “de-facto low-skilled immigration policy” (also discussed here at the ABC).
  • In late June 2018 the government released new laws to combat modern slavery which, bizarrely, imposed zero punishment for enslaving coolies.
  • Over the following few months we witnessed widespread visa rorting across cafes and restaurants, including among high end establishments like the Rockpool Group.
  • Then Alan Fels, head of the Migrant Workers Taskforce, revealed that international students are systematically exploited particularly by bosses of the same ethnicity.

Academic research also supports it. Below are key excepts from Chapter 13 entitled Temporary migrant workers (TMWs), underpayment and predatory business models, written by Iain Campbell:

This chapter argues that the expansion of temporary labour migration is a significant development in Australia and that it has implications for wage stagnation…

Three main facts about their presence in Australia are relevant to the discussion of wage stagnation. First, there are large numbers of TMWs in Australia, currently around 1.2 million persons. Second, those numbers have increased strongly over the past 15 years. Third, when employed, many TMWs are subject to exploitation, including wage payments that fall below — sometimes well below — the minimum levels specified in employment regulation…

One link to slow wages growth, as highlighted by orthodox economics, stems from the simple fact of increased numbers, which add to labour supply and thereby help to moderate wages growth. This chapter argues, however, that the more salient point concerns the way many TMWs are mistreated within the workplace in industry sectors such as food services, horticulture, construction, personal services and cleaning. TMW underpayments, which appear both widespread in these sectors and systemic, offer insights into labour market dynamics that are also relevant to the general problem of slow wages growth…

Official stock data indicate that the visa programmes for international students, temporary skilled workers and working holiday makers have tripled in numbers since the late 1990s… In all, the total number of TMWs in Australia is around 1.2 million persons. If we include New Zealand citizens and permanent residents, who can enter Australia under a special subclass 444 visa, without time limits on their stay and with unrestricted work rights (though without access to most social security payments), then the total is close to 2 million persons… TMWs now make up around 6% of the total Australian workforce…

Decisions by the federal Coalition government under John Howard to introduce easier pathways to permanent residency for temporary visa holders, especially international students and temporary skilled workers, gave a major impetus to TMW visa programmes.

Most international students and temporary skilled workers, together with many working holiday makers, see themselves as involved in a project of ‘staggered’ or ‘multi-step’ migration, whereby they hope to leap from their present status into a more long-term visa status, ideally permanent residency. One result, as temporary migration expands while the permanent stream remains effectively capped, is a lengthening queue of onshore applicants for permanent residency…

Though standard accounts describe Australian immigration as oriented to skilled labour, this characterisation stands at odds with the abundant evidence on expanding temporary migration and the character of TMW jobs. It is true that many TMWs, like their counterparts in the permanent stream, are highly qualified and in this sense skilled. However, the fact that their work is primarily in lower-skilled jobs suggests that it is more accurate, as several scholars point out, to speak of a shift in Australia towards a de facto low-skilled migration programme

A focus on raw numbers of TMWs may miss the main link to slow wages growth. It is the third point concerning underpayments and predatory business models that seems richest in implications. This point suggests, first and most obviously, added drag on wages growth in sectors where such underpayments and predatory business models have become embedded. If they become more widely practised, underpayments pull down average hourly wages. If a substantial number of firms in a specific labour market intensify strategies of labour cost minimisation by pushing wage rates below the legal floor, it can unleash a dynamic of competition around wage rates that foreshadows wage decline rather than wage growth for employees…

Increases in labour supply allow employers in sectors already oriented to flexible and low-wage employment, such as horticulture and food services, to sustain and extend strategies of labour cost minimisation… The arguments and evidence cited above suggest a spread of predatory business models within low-wage industries.37 They suggest an unfolding process of degradation in these labour markets…

And below are extracts from Chapter 14, entitled Is there a wages crisis facing skilled temporary migrants?, by Joanna Howe:

Scarcely a day goes by without another headline of wage theft involving temporary migrant workers…

In this chapter we explore a largely untold story in relation to temporary migrant workers… it exposes a very real wages crisis facing workers on the Temporary Skill Shortage (TSS) visa (formerly the 457 visa) in Australia. This crisis has been precipitated by the federal government’s decision to freeze the salary floor for temporary skilled migrant workers since 2013… the government has chosen to put downward pressure on real wages for temporary skilled migrants, thereby surreptitiously allowing the TSS visa to be used in lower-paid jobs…

In Australia, these workers are employed via the TSS visa and they must be paid no less than a salary floor. This salary floor is called the Temporary Skilled Migration Income Threshold (TSMIT). TSMIT was introduced in 2009 in response to widespread concerns during the Howard Government years of migrant worker exploitation. This protection was considered important because an independent review found that many 457 visa workers were not receiving wages equivalent to those received by Australian workers…

In effect, TSMIT is intended to act as a proxy for the skill level of a particular occupation. It prevents unscrupulous employers misclassifying an occupation at a higher skill level in order to employ a TSS visa holder at a lower level…

TSMIT’s protective ability is only as strong as the level at which it is set. In its original iteration back in 2009, it was set at A$45 220. This level was determined by reference to average weekly earnings for Australians, with the intention that TSMIT would be pegged to this because the Australian government considered it ‘important that TSMIT keep pace with wage growth across the Australian labour market’. This indexation occurred like clockwork for five years. But since 1 July 2013, TSMIT has been frozen at a level of A$53 900. ..

There is now a gap of more than A$26 000 between the salary floor for temporary skilled migrant workers and annual average salaries for Australian workers. This means that the TSS visa can increasingly be used to employ temporary migrant workers in occupations that attract a far lower salary than that earned by the average Australian worker. This begs the question — is the erosion of TSMIT allowing the TSS visa to morph into a general labour supply visa rather than a visa restricted to filling labour market gaps in skilled, high-wage occupations?..

But why would employers go to all the effort of hiring a temporary migrant worker on a TSS visa over an Australian worker?

Renowned Australian demographer Graeme Hugo observed that employers ‘will always have a “demand” for foreign workers if it results in a lowering of their costs’.  The simplistic notion that employers will only go to the trouble and expense of making a TSS visa application when they want to meet a skill shortage skims over a range of motives an employer may have for using the TSS visa. These could be a reluctance to invest in training for existing or prospective staff, or a desire to move towards a deunionised workforce. Additionally, for some employers, there could be a belief that, despite the requirement that TSS visa workers be employed on equivalent terms to locals, it is easier to avoid paying market salary rates and conditions for temporary migrant workers who have been recognised as being in a vulnerable labour market position. A recent example of this is the massive underpayments of chefs and cooks employed by Australia’s largest high-end restaurant business, Rockpool Dining Group, which found that visa holders were being paid at levels just above TSMIT but well below the award when taking into account the amount of overtime being done…

Put simply, temporary demand for migrant workers often creates a permanent need for them in the labour market. Research shows that in industries where employers have turned to temporary migrants en masse, it erodes wages and conditions in these industries over time, making them less attractive to locals…

A national survey of temporary migrant workers found that 24% of 457 visa holders who responded to the survey were paid less than A$18 an hour.  Not only are these workers not being paid in according with TSMIT, but they are also receiving less than the minimum wage. A number of cases also expose creative attempts by employers to subvert TSMIT. Given the challenges many temporary migrants face in accessing legal remedies, these cases are likely only scratching the surface in terms of employer non-compliance with TSMIT…

Combined, then, with the problems with enforcement and compliance, it is not hard to conclude that the failure to index TSMIT is contributing to a wages crisis for skilled temporary migrant workers… So the failure to index the salary floor for skilled migrant workers is likely to affect wages growth for these workers, as well as to have broader implications for all workers in the Australian labour market.

It’s not just temporary visas. It is the entire mass immigration model:

  • students, visa holders, tourists all work for nothing to gain longer terms visas;
  • their numbers are endless and so is the labour supply shock;
  • and that endless flow has now generated a supply side adjustment to businesses that thrive on cheap foreign labour – basically service economy dross – that holds up empty calorie growth, boosts asset prices and the currency, holds own productivity via capital shallowing, and hollows out tradables in an era of global lowflation.

Thus everybody can get some work, nobody can get enough of it, participation skyrockets but productivity craters. Wages can’t rise and the economy spirals, literally, into a dumbening singularity.

That’s why I shop at Woolies.

David Llewellyn-Smith
Latest posts by David Llewellyn-Smith (see all)


  1. If you try and contribute a comment to one of the Fairfax-Nine broadsheets even mentioning “mass immigration” you are censored. You might get away with suggesting that the tensions and loss of faith in Australian politics have a common link with BREXIT and Trump, but state that it is a link involving immigration and a decay of cultural and public values is at its heart and you are censored.

    In The Guardian you become “pre-moderated” as the Radical-Left chorus will call you a racist, bigot, xenophobe….

    And if you are an academic who dares to suggest that the tertiary education industry is failing foreign students, you are sued.

    Trying to suggest that wage theft is built into he same mass immigration economy, even with hard data, you will be ignored.

    Even if you have video footage of an Indian student in leg irons being lashed by a Brahmin caste 7-11 investor with a cat o’ nine tails whilst munching a curry it shall be ignored. To even see it would be evidence of racism.

    At the heart of all this is that we have lost our ability to have an honest conversation. Our free speech is not ‘under threat’, it has been taken away already.

    Millions of Australian voices have been silenced and a megaphone handed to the likes of Innes Willox, Liz Allen and any self-interested spin doctor and spiv who steps up to support mass immigration – the bipartisan plan supported by the LNP and ALP because it is the only plan they have.

    • Decent points.

      Australia needs to be able to have an honest conversation about the two types of immigration – social and economic – and what is actually good and what is not.

      We need to do the above instead of the Left and Right being eachother’s useful idiot lemmings.

  2. I can’t understand why any of this gets called out when it is precisely the plan! Why is the media all uppity over it when they’re part of the problem?

  3. SDA is a tame union. I would almost go as far as to say, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Coles Group.
    I’ve worked in a lot of different industries over the years, private and public sector, and I worked night-fill at Coles back in my uni days. I’m struggling to think of another workplace where management actively encourages you to join the union, and where the union has a bulletin board and pamphlet rack permanently affixed to the staff break-room wall.

  4. The SDA has been a facilitator of reducing shop worker payments. As would be expected from their rightwing, catholic leadership.

    I am intrigued by the TWU’s attitude to the imported truck drivers. Are they happy to collect union fees and turn a blind eye to trip payment / other tricks to reduce award rates? Owner-driver magazines certainly have some critical comments.

    • The SDA are not a union in the traditional sense, they arrange wage restructuring with the employer on behalf of the employee, but in the employers favour, then the employee has to take it or leave it because their “Union” arranged it to save them.

      They did it with Pizza Hut in the early 1990’s, cutting the pay of all staff and those of use dependant on the money had to take it or leave it. I went from $120 a week for 15 hours to $89 a week for 20 hours and we were told it was a good deal…. I left uni and looked for full time work as I could no longer pay my bills.

  5. Strange Economics of Ethical rating and starvationMEMBER

    So this is the ethical dilemma typical of anything in life –
    if you take a black and white judgement of Yes/No – In this case you’d starve.

    Instead you need to rate them on a scale -1 to -10 and boycott.
    What level does each person pick –
    say anything over -5…
    eg So start by boycotting say those that deliberately falsify (eg those TV chef restaurants) timesheets…..

  6. “”It is structural. It is deliberate. It is driven by the mass immigration growth model which neither controls nor cares about these outcomes. It is loved by the Right because it delivers fat rentiers easier profits. It is loved by the Left because it’s not racist. It is loved by the media because it drives property listings. It is loved by Treasury because more warm bodies boost the Budget. It is loved by the RBA because it doesn’t have to account for its housing bubble.””

    Yes, so much love … loving it to death.