Transurban feasts on population ponzi

Transurban continues to feast on the ‘Big Australia’ mass immigration policy, delivering more strong growth on its toll road network:

Transurban’s half-year profit rose by 11 per cent amid higher traffic on its toll roads in Australia…

Net profit totalled $162m in the six months through December, rising from $145m a year ago.

Proportional earnings before interest, taxation, depreciation and amortisation, reflecting income from Transurban’s stakes in toll road assets, rose 9.5 per cent to $1.09bn after removing acquisition costs. Proportional toll revenue increased 8.6 per cent to $1.39bn…

Australia’s major cities are expanding at a rapid rate, resulting in more cars on the road and stoking concerns around congestion. Sydney is projected by government statisticians to have up to 25 per cent more residents in the decade through mid-2027. Even faster growth is forecast for Melbourne, which could become Australia’s biggest city…

Crikey’s Stephen Mayne recently exposed the unbelievable extortion of motorists by Transurban, which has taken place with the blessing of Australia’s governments:

Transurban was created by Macquarie Group and Transfield in 1995 to bid for Citylink, a major Kennett government toll road project in Melbourne. Macquarie pocketed a $25 million success from the deal and Transurban was floated in 1996 at the equivalent of $1 a share.

More than 20 years later, Melbourne’s Citylink project is the world’s second most valuable privately owned toll road. This has allowed Transurban to extract the following tolls from motorists over the past six years:

  • 2013-14: $535m
  • 2014-15: $577m
  • 2015-16: $660m
  • 2016-17: $687m
  • 2017-18: $780m
  • 2018-19: $813m

That, however, is dwarfed by the story in Sydney where Transurban now controls seven different toll roads which managed to lift total toll revenue from $1.34 billion in 2017-18 to a record $1.53 billion last financial year. This is primarily due to the addition of the M4 motorway, which is part of the monster $9.3 billion Westconnex privatisation deal sealed by the NSW Liberal government last year.

The story in Brisbane is more modest. Here, Transurban managed to lift tolling revenue from its five different toll roads from $629 million in 2017-18 to a record $644 million last year. All up, motorists in Australia’s three biggest cities were stung $2.98 billion for tolls by Transurban last financial year…

Transurban is the Pac-Man of toll roads, snapping up ownership stakes in all but two of Australia’s toll roads…

Only in Australia could a company which has seen its share price go from $1 to more than $15 have a history of never having paid corporate tax. Even James Packer has said this is a rort

Transurban repeatedly outplays state governments by negotiating lucrative bolt-on expansions and acquisitions to its existing monopoly toll road assets up and down the eastern seaboard.

All of which is part of Transurban’s plan to control Australia’s road system and become the prime beneficiary of Australia’s mass immigration ‘Big Australia’ policy:

Toll road giant Transurban is positioning itself to manage the entire road networks of Australia’s three major cities as governments make the “inevitable” shift to road pricing.

A senior Transurban executive told a private meeting of investors this month that the company wanted to be viewed as the “natural custodian” of the nation’s motorways, in the likely event of motorists being charged to drive on them.

The Melbourne-based company has a near monopoly on private roads in Australia already, controlling 13 of the 15 toll roads in Melbourne, Sydney and Brisbane.

Analysts Morgan Stanley have described a Transurban-run, user-pays system across all roads as a “meta-monopoly”.

Such a move would further entrench the company – which owns Citylink in Melbourne, the M2 in Sydney and all of Brisbane’s toll roads – as a de-facto private sector planning agency in those major cities.

Few, if any, countries in the world have allowed a private operator to control so much of their road network.

While Australian living standards are being crushed by the never-ending population deluge, Transurban is laughing all the way to the bank.

Leith van Onselen
Latest posts by Leith van Onselen (see all)


    • Whisper is they are trying to bring in a priority lane where people pay even more.
      But gov is pushing back on it, basically a first class till road option

  1. nom nom nom….all those dividends coming my way. Say, didn’t you guys recommend selling TCL…….how did that workout?
    Always bet on greed and corruption.

  2. Transurban also pays zero tax, thanks to sweatheart deals with politicians and civil servants, many of whom seem to be employed at Transurban after “retiring” according to Michael West.

    • TCL is a stapled entity with most of the income flowing through the land holding trust to shareholders. That is how all trusts operate in Aust. The corporate part of the group does pay tax and pays a small franked dividend.

      Michael West should know better than to continue to pedal the “trusts are tax avoiders” line.

      • Even StevenMEMBER

        Agree with Jason. Doesn’t change my view that Transurban has been negotiating very good outcomes for its shareholders at expense of the Australian taxpayer. As long as Big Australia mindset is around, TCL remains a very attractive stock.

        Owning a lot of shares in it is my only offset to the feeling of being reamed by excessive immigration.

        • Except that owning it at the price may not be the smartest thing you could do. Australia’s projected growth rates are already reflected in the share price – they are no secret to anyone. So, your risks are plentiful. What happens if the population growth rate turns south for some or other unforeseen reason? Lower future revenues. A deep global recession (entirely likely) – much less traffic on the roads. Increased working from home / less trips. Political risk – a future Govt decides to closely regulate the returns that TCL is able to earn – also strongly likely. All the above lead to much lower projected revenues / earnings.

          • Even StevenMEMBER

            The prospect of immigration declining is sufficiently unlikely in my mind. Even in recession, Australia still remains an attractive destination for third-world immigrants. The Government might even decide to ramp it up… you know… for GDP’s sake.

            As for regulation, the Government can’t even regulate exports of LNG (a blind freddy situation if ever I’ve seen one) let alone the far more complex problem of infrastructure costings.

        • What about if we cut back on parts of the welfare state – would that dissuade immigrants from coming?

          The thing is: free education and healthcare is a big deal. That in itself is a huge selling point to third worlders.

  3. The inefficiency of having 17 million peasant “voters” is obvious. The sooner that LibLab elections can be fought out among the registered and cashed-up rent-seekers, the better. Universal Suffrage is so 20th century.