Sydney’s water storages are plumetting at a faster rate than was experienced during the 2000s Millennial Drought, which was said to be the worst drought in Australia’s recorded history:

This has authorities concerned that Sydney could soon face “day zero” – a time when the city runs out of drinking water:
Sydney’s water storage levels are on track to be at their lowest in history by next year as authorities grapple with how to stave off the looming prospect of a Sydney “day zero’’ — the day we run dry.
The current decline in water reserves has been so swift that Greater Sydney’s combined water storage is set to be smaller than what was recorded in the millennial drought by late next year. And it is understood that a planned expansion of the city’s desalination plant will only temporarily hasten the decline in water levels when the plant is forced offline for a month…
Current forecasts say Sydney has enough water to last only until May 2022.
Asked about the crisis, Water Minister Melinda Pavey said “Sydney is not immune to the drought” and added that the decline in water since August 2017 was the biggest drop in storage ever recorded. “NSW is in the worst drought on record, city and country,’’ she said.
“We all need to be doing our bit to conserve as much water as we can”…
Ms Pavey said Sydney faced “the biggest decline in water storage on record”.
The key difference between now and the 2006 water storage low is that Sydney’s population has grown by around one million people (~20%) over that period, which has dramatically increased water demand.
As we know, Sydney is the nation’s prime immigration gateway, importing an extra 77,100 people in 2017-18:

Sydney’s population is also projected by the ABS to balloon by 94,000 people a year for the next 48 years, effectively doubling the city’s population to 9.75 million people. And all of this growth will come from net overseas migration (NOM):

Even as droughts become more common and severe and evapotranspiration rates skyrocket:

A ballooning population alongside water-draining climate change is obviously a dangerous combination that will inevitably lead to chronic water shortages and the need to construct an entire battery of energy-hungry desalination plants up and down the coast.
This situation is made worse by the fact that most new migrants locate in Sydney’s West, which is farthest away from the ocean and makes desalination less viable (and more expensive).
This planning lunacy will mean Sydneysiders will die of thirst long before its population targets are met.
Or we can, you know, cut immigration now.
- Another Big Australia shill moans about housing shortages - May 19, 2022
- Two-tier minimum pay rise flagged by Fair Work - May 19, 2022
- Sydney’s sick auction market a harbinger for house price falls - May 19, 2022
A very fundamental ‘quality of life’ question is about to be asked of our leaders. What say ye?
In Straya, there is only one measure of ‘quality of life’; rising house prices.
28 years of GDP growth. Now that’s quality.
or water quality?
As Cape Town learned, you can’t use the last 20 to 23% of water in a dam – it’s either mud or stuck in pools far from the outlet.
Sydney is in bigger trouble than they realize.
“Or we can, you know, cut immigration now”. Duh… And risk housing prices falling? No way! Besides, the Grubbermint already has a cunning plan. Immigrants to the regions! That’ll fix Skidknee’s watery problem.
Boom in water prices on the way!! Wooooohooooo!!
buy shares in bottled water?
And don’t forget to restrict water supply for profit maximisation. After all, that’s the Strayan way of doing things!!
Need to privatise Sydney water
Market efficiency will sort this out
……and poor people don’t need to take showers anyway
…..getititaya straya !
I can’t wait for the reality series called “Water Wars” … Western Sydney vs Eastern Sydney. Whoever wins gets to cut off water to the loser.
Yah, the Greens will be right across this. No problems.
Oh, it’s all the Greens fault, didn’tyaknow.
Strawman, bolstrood. I’ve never made that claim, but they sure as hell haven’t helped, and their risible immigration policies would only exacerbate problems.
Green – no longer a goal, just a brand.
Your first comment is Not a straw man ? ? ?
Why not put the blame where it belongs ?
With the parties that have been in Government for the lat 30 years .
I expected better Oh Ghost Who Walks
Oh, I do, but the greens are supposed to stand for something. They’re supposed to want to protect the environment, Under Bob, they did. I may not have always agreed with him, but he at least stood for something, and I respect that. These “nouveau” greens though? Just as complicit in the rape of the environment as the 2 big parties. If they were fair dinkum they’d be pushing for zero nom, but no, just virtue signalling and politics.
So yes, they should be singled out for special scorn. Frauds and cretins.
Paging Dr Smithy to reception.
Do each of the States have access to enough energy to run desal plants they already have & what if they need more desal?
Meh. We have lots of coal to power this stuff….
Access to energy isn’t really an issue. Building a new desal plant in any of the major cities is minimum $1.5B and 2 years if you have all planning and approvals in place, could easily be double both. Huge cost these days in “integration assets” – ie getting the water from the front gate of the plant into your supply system – pipes, pump stations, storage etc. Low hanging fruit already taken in this regard (just like building roads), so progressively more expensive from now on (and takes longer to build). Expanding existing plants might get you 20% more production but that would be a major refit (and yes, plant offline for a period whilst that was happening).
import thousands of Indian slave labourers and have them build a de-salination or better yet, have the NSW Govt sign the One-Belt One-Road Pact and have the Chinese construct it, after all, the largest growing demographic in Sydney and Melbourne are overseas students arriving here for a migration outcome from India and China.
I live in South Western Sydney, Indian population is growing rapidly here, some say hello, but the ones that just stare at you, don’t know what their problem is, usually the older ones with shoal over their head.
They hate us for our freedoms. Or not. I don’t know.
All I know is that they hate us with every fibre of their being.
they save water though, cos they only wash once a fortnight
@Wrigley more than offset by the fact they don’t poo-in-the-loo.
I am disappointed we couldn’t find a way to blame equality and feminism for this
Surely a gif could solve things.
lol and some self righteousness is always helpful
do you say that gif or jif?
Average water usage per person is ~340 ltrs would equate to 34 ML per year off 100k population increase. x 20 years compounding
Also how water usage from these fires?
This place is #####
Because I’m a geeky numbers nerd I’ve been tracking the levels in Warragamba dam as a proxy for the entire Sydney water supply system.
Water restrictions put in place earlier in the year slowed consumption from the dam drastically for a while, but it’s shot up again recently to about 0.5% per week. With the dam currently at 47.5% capacity that means it will run dry in less than 100 weeks…sometime in early Q4 2021. Things will change of course…a bit of rain, increased restrictions etc, but that’s the situation at the moment.
This is the national gorilla in the room. All the concerns about house prices, stock markets and trade wars will fade into insignificance when a few million people have muddy sludge or nothing at all coming from their taps in Sydney in 2 years time.
A bit like this…
https://www.forbes.com/sites/marshallshepherd/2019/07/01/why-chennai-is-running-out-of-water-in-2-satellite-images-and-an-explanation/#69f2b7229b41
Barnaby has already pre-taped an interview blaming it on the Greens and Labor and carp and that bloody woman the social media spotlight forced him to shack up with.
I thought the Beetroota would have his eye on his favourite sport, not PR interviews.
Also you can’t run the dam down to 0% linearly. As Cape Town learned, you can’t use the last 20 to 23% of water in a dam – it’s either mud or stuck in pools far from the outlet.
Sydney needs stricter water restrictions. But Sydney Water makes money based on amount of water sold, so they don’t want to restrict usage. There is a serious conflict of interest here.
Ain’t privatization wonderful?
Very interesting point about total water versus usable water. I wasn’t aware it was so significant. Brings Day Zero for Warragamba to about this time next year then under current circumstances.
There is no conflict.
Sydney Water can make more money – much more – by restricting supply. You know, like the gubbermints do with land release.
I am designing the Strayan version of Monopoly. Here, whoever owns the utility will win the game cos it will demand the rent of 1000 times the numbers shown on the dice.
I flew over this dam last week. The whole south end currently has no water with the odd pool here and there.
Hmmm. Warragamba holds about 2,000,000 ML, and all the other dams supplying Sydney hold about 570 ML combined, which is why I think Warragamba is a good proxy for the entire system.
If it is turning into mud puddles now then things may actually be quite a bit worse than TPTB are letting on to the small people. Cataract Dam is down to 26%, which may be effectively close to 0% if Wrigley is write about usable water in dams.
More fantastic number crunching, thanks LSWCHP
Lucy Turnbull’s big plan for Eight Million in Three Sydneys is on top of the fire and water crises. Not.
She’ll be one of the first flying out to Manhattan when the city goes dry
Guarantee Mal would have had one of these installed in the backyard. Fed directly from the harbour.
https://www.echotecwatermakers.com/beach_house_desalination_systems.htm
“Or we can, you know, cut immigration now.”
And if now is too late?
Much like addressing climate change, now is too late.
But it’s still better than later.
Is it possible to outsource our water supply via the free market? I understand that usually can solve a problem.
Better planning will also fix thing. We need to form task forces, committees, working groups etc and they all need to do a lot of planning. That will supply water to Sydney.
How will the politicians be held accountable?
They have pretty much signed a death warrant for the city.
All 100% predictable in advance.
When the water runs out, all politicians who voted in favour of increasing immigration should have all their assets sold for water donations.
They better hope for a LOT of rain to delay the problem, but it will never resolve it.
It’s just another example (of the endless examples) of how utterly brain dead these politicians are.
It is completely beyond my comprehension how an educated human can be so stupid.
” It is completely beyond my comprehension how an educated human can be so stupid.”
“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it!”