Bill Evans: RBA still to cut, with QE to follow

Via Bill Evans at Westpac:

The Reserve Bank has released its quarterly Statement on Monetary Policy (SMP). The two key areas of most interest in the Statement are around further policy insights and the RBA’s growth, unemployment and inflation outlook.

The discussion on policy was particularly interesting. The Overview for the Statement, which we expect largely reflects the Governor’s own views, provides the most open analysis of policy options that we have seen. In outlining the policy decision in October, the Overview noted “the Board was mindful that rates were already very low and that each further cut brings closer the point at which other policy options come into play”. This represents a more open approach to the discussion around unconventional policies. To date, that discussion has been characterised by comments such as “unlikely”, whereas this wording indicates almost an automatic move from cash rate policy to other policy options. To be sure, there is no firm commitment to move in that direction but the wording indicates that such a transition to other options may be considered to be a normal approach to policy.

Other issues around a very low cash rate, including that it may “unintentionally convey an overly negative view of the economic outlook” and “the usual channels of policy transmission might be less effective”, also signal that the cash rate cut cycle is nearing an end. That said, lower rates are seen as having some impact. Indeed, the usual channels of lower exchange rate and boosting household disposable income are pointed out. However, a new channel, “higher asset prices”, has been added to the list. Arguably, given that Sydney and Melbourne house prices bottomed out in May, the June and July rate cuts played a significant role in turning those markets. It is of some interest that the SMP highlights this channel as a constructive aspect of interest rate policy.

Commentary on the current policy position signals that rates are almost certain to remain on hold at the December Board meeting. Since the decision in November was part of a plan to allow time to assess the effects of the recent easing of monetary policy as well as global developments, no doubt the RBA’s observation that the low point in global pessimism may have passed is an important aspect of the current policy standing.

On balance, Westpac believes that its assessment that with the unemployment rate still well above the RBA’s target (4.5%) and the RBA seeing that there is a balance between the benefits and costs of lower rates, our view that 0.5% is the effective lower bound and that some transition to unconventional policies is likely is supported by this SMP.

The second point of interest in the SMP is around the RBA’s forecasts. As we anticipated in our preview to this SMP, the key growth forecasts for 2020 of 2.8% which was adopted in August, has been retained in this SMP. That is much higher than Westpac’s forecast of 2.4%. Surprisingly, the forecast in November includes a more optimistic outlook for dwelling construction for 2020 (-2.6%, upgraded from -3.3%) and business investment (+6.2% upgraded from +5.8%). Partially offsetting that more optimistic view is the lowering in growth of public demand from +3.2% to +2.9%. These forecasts for 2020 contrasts with Westpac’s forecast of 2.4% for GDP growth, -6% for dwelling investment, and +2.8% for business investment. Overall, Westpac’s forecast for growth in GNE of 2.3% in 2020 compares to 2.8% from the RBA. Looking further out, the RBA has retained its optimistic growth forecast for 2021 of 3.1% compared to our forecast of 2.7% with a substantial part of the difference being explained by the RBA seeing a much more rapid recovery in the dwelling investment cycle.

This substantial difference between Westpac and the RBA on the construction cycle partly hinges around the link between established house prices and construction activity. Furthermore, even the RBA points out that the current expected pipeline of construction may be overstating actual activity.

There have been some modest downward revisions to the inflation and wages outlook. Even though the unemployment rate profile of 5.2% in December 2020 and 4.9% by December 2021 is unchanged from August, wages growth for December 2021 has been cut from 2.4% to 2.3% (“wages growth is no longer expected to pick up”) and growth in the trimmed mean inflation measure has been cut from 2.1% to 1.9%. It must be particularly uncomfortable for the RBA to be forecasting that underlying and headline inflation will remain below the bottom of the 2-3% target band right out into 2021.

Readers will be aware that on November 6, Westpac advocated the bringing forward of the legislated personal income tax cuts, which had been timed for June 2022, to June 2020 and June 2021 (evenly distributed). If the Federal Government were to take up that policy option, then Westpac’s forecasts for consumer spending, housing activity and business investment will be lifted.

Conclusion

The November SMP provides the clearest insight yet into the RBA’s thinking about policy in 2020. The acceptance that, after rates reach a certain threshold, other policy options “might come into play” is quite significant. The recognition that asset prices are an additional channel of monetary policy and are assessed to be a positive channel is also important.

The overview of the RBA’s growth outlook, while largely unchanged from August, still appears to be overly optimistic, particularly around the residential construction cycle and business investment. On the other hand, the downbeat view on wages, inflation and the unemployment rate make it clear that the RBA does not believe that its job is done and so we can expect further policy action from the RBA in 2020. Westpac continues to expect the RBA to cut to 0.50% in February 2020 and to move to unconventional policies at an appropriate time.

Capital Economics agrees:

By signalling in its quarterly statement on monetary policy today that inflation will remain below the lower end of its 2-3 per cent target band for the foreseeable future, the RBA signalled that further easing is on the cards,” says chief economist, Marcel Thieliant.

What matters in the end though is be the outlook for inflation.

We think that the unemployment rate will rise to 5.5pc before long, which is why we expect underlying inflation to fall further below 2pc.

In that scenario, the Bank will have little choice but to ease policy further.

As does Sally Auld at JPM:

The Bank has made modest downgrades to its forecast set, despite having delivered 75bp easing since June.

The implication of this forecast set and its underlying assumptions is that more than just one further 25bp easing will be required to generate outcomes consistent with the inflation target. From here, the debate will focus upon what form additional stimulus will take, and how quickly it can be delivered.

…the Bank is perhaps prepared to move towards unconventional policies sooner than expected.

And Citi:

Household consumption could remain softer than expected, a risk that the RBA highlights in the comment ‘consumption growth is expected to pick up gradually in the period ahead, but the timing of the turnaround, the speed of its trajectory and the influence of the housing market on it are key uncertainties for the outlook.

If realised, this would have flow-on effects to construction employment, incomes and household consumption.

We still look to February as the next opportunity for the RBA Board to make policy more accommodative.

Plus George Theranou at UBS:

Overall, UBS retain a below consensus growth outlook, & more dovish view on the RBA than the market. However, recent positive trade news, & today’s RBA comments, materially raises the risk that the next 25bps cut is delayed to Feb-20, instead of Dec-19. Regardless of timing, we still expect another 25bp cut to 0.25% by mid-2020. However, we again stress, this is ‘conditional’ on further global central bank easing. Our view was reinforced today by the RBA presenting new modelling showing the economy is very sensitive to the AUD, with a 5% move in the TWI changing forecasts of GDP by ~½%, UR ~40bps & core CPI ~30bps. The ‘triggers to cut are: a rise in the unemployment rate, as well as no material fiscal stimulus in MYEFO, & more global CB easing (which puts upward pressure on the AUD if the RBA don’t respond). Overall, we also still think the RBA has more room for conventional policy to support the economy first via cash rate cuts, rather than having to jump …

It appears MB has finally conquered them all.

Time to turn hawkish?!?

Houses and Holes

David Llewellyn-Smith is Chief Strategist at the MB Fund and MB Super. David is the founding publisher and editor of MacroBusiness and was the fouding publisher and global economy editor of The Diplomat, the Asia Pacific’s leading geo-politics and economics portal.

He is also a former gold trader and economic commentator at The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, the ABC and Business Spectator. He is the co-author of The Great Crash of 2008 with Ross Garnaut and was the editor of the second Garnaut Climate Change Review.

Latest posts by Houses and Holes (see all)

Comments

  1. ““the Board was mindful that rates were already very low and that each further cut brings closer the point at which other policy options come into play”.” – wow.

      • You make it sound like the RBA has a ‘moral’ obligation to preference savers over borrowers. Borrowers are a greater economic driver than savers. Savers need to either consume or invest their capital, otherwise they do nothing for the economy.

    • How about the government actually does something? They are going straight to QE without actually trying anything.

      The LNP expects the RBA to do all the heavy lifting so they can say “we got the budget to surplus, we’re good economic managers!”

      Honestly, what a bunch of twats. They have no clue.

  2. Jumping jack flash

    So much gold.

    “To be sure, there is no firm commitment to move in that direction but the wording indicates that such a transition to other options may be considered to be a normal approach to policy.”

    Of course it is “normal”. Implementing QE? As natural as breathing.
    Right up there with interest rate manipulation. Nobody thinks twice about that anymore. In fact, it is now expected.

    “the June and July rate cuts played a significant role in turning [the housing] markets. It is of some interest that the SMP highlights this channel as a constructive aspect of interest rate policy.”

    Well, well, well… asset price inflation is now a constructive aspect of cutting interest rates. It was only a matter of time.
    Can you for a minute consider the alternative? It would be bad. Very bad. So “house prices to the moon” is now an official RBA goal. And for now they are succeeding! (At least they can do something right!)

    • But we’re not in an emergency situation, so why the QE? Oh silly me, forgot it’s not about emergencies, it’s all about protecting asset prices. I knew this was coming. That’s why I’ve jumped ship. No doubt the ship will sink eventually but I would very pissed right about now if I hadn’t bought.

      • Jumping jack flash

        “Oh silly me, forgot it’s not about emergencies, it’s all about protecting asset prices”

        It seems they’re no longer pretending.

        Oh wait, I get it.
        For years the RBA has cut interest rates under the guise of inflating incomes and creating jobs. They failed hard pretty much every time and only produced asset price inflation. So now to gain a shred of credibility they say “we’ll cut rates to inflate asset prices”. And lo and behold!

        • It is not an RBA failure if most Aussies will only use cheap capital to outbid each other at auctions, or buy the same basket of blue-chip equities, thereby inflating asset prices. It is not up to the RBA to start businesses and create jobs, they can only create the right environment for it. Ultimately, the failure is with the rent-seeking masses.

          • Jumping jack flash

            “is not up to the RBA to start businesses and create jobs, they can only create the right environment for it. ”

            Indeed, but after cutting interest rates for almost a decade, while nothing happens except asset price inflation they’ve got to be a little frustrated.

            The point was that the RBA now counts asset price inflation as a favourable outcome of interest rate manipulation, whereas about 12 months ago or more they were hesitant to cut because they didn’t want asset prices to inflate… they knew even then that the asset prices inflating was pretty much the only thing they could expect from cutting interest rates.

            Now they don’t care. Probably because Josh has laid down the law and basically requested asset price inflation…

            This goes back to my comment about why voters choose the Libs. They can make things happen that matter. Who cares about long term outlook and future stability? The people want instant riches from receiving piles of other people’s debt!

          • It is the RBA’s job to control asset price inflation.

            The irony is that that they should be either be putting rates up to stop the most recent bubble or the banks lending should be restricted because if/when the economic crappola hits the fan, its the RBA thats going to have to step in to support the over leveraged banks.

            But no… the banana republic is just going to print money – dat will fix de ting!

  3. tl’dr the western system is going down or headed for a clash with the eastern systems.
    Gonna pay off my house and buy a yacht to tool around on while some sub human rents my home.

    #neoliberallyfe

    • HadronCollision

      Yacht = Paul’s gulch

      You could head to western tas , SW WA? Rest of the joint looks farked according to IOD and SAM plus climate forging

      Been a rough day in NNSW

Leave a reply

You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in now