Are Fortescue dividends sustainable? Lol

Financial markets are really just large bucket shops so you can always predict what is coming at certain points of the cycle. For mining, the cycle peak is always marked by the “dividends are sustainable” pitch, via AFR:

Fortescue Metals’ dividend policy is “definitely sustainable” says chief executive Elizabeth Gaines as the iron ore miner enters a three year period in which it will spend $US3.37 billion ($5 billion) on new mines and is due to repay $US2.15 billion of debt.

…”We think that dividend policy is definitely sustainable,” she said.

”You would expect in periods of high iron ore prices that we would be toward the upper end of that range, and if iron ore prices are lower it would probably be toward the middle or toward the lower end of that range. It will flex and it is intentionally designed to do that.”

FMG is an evangelist so it probably believes it. It is wrong, again.

The arguments are all very familiar:

  • supply side capex discipline;
  • China forever;
  • no acquisition spree.

But it won’t matter. Production is still rising from the previous cycle with roughly 100mt of high grade ore still in the pipeline.

Moreover, despite outrageous Chinese steel production growth, iron ore imports have been falling for two years:

As scrap steel output booms:

And this was while Chinese iron ore output cratered.

Ahead lies falling Chinese steel production, ever rising scrap inputs, falling iron ore imports and a renewed marginal cost shakeout deep into 2020s.

By the end of it, I expect iron ore to trade at $30 per tonne consistently and still expect FMG will be forced to not only cut the dividend but to shrink its volumes materially.

It’s done well to survive but it’s all downhill from here.

Comments are hidden for Membership Subscribers only.