Bill Evans’ Budget preview

From Bill Evans at Westpac today:


Westpac expects the underlying budget deficit for 2014/15 to be announced by the government as $26.0bn on Budget night on May 13. That is about $8bn lower than the estimate from the government’s Mid Year review of $33.9bn.
• The improvement will come from a modest increase in the government’s nominal GDP growth forecasts, 3.5% to 4.25% for 2013/14 and 3.5% to 4.0% for 2014/15. That will improve the 2014/15 starting point by $4bn. There will also be a number of policy initiatives on both the revenue and spending sides (a further $5bn). Partly offsetting the reduced spending initiatives will be a $1bn increase in infrastructure investment.
• On the revenue side it looks likely the government will announce a temporary deficit levy raising $1bn a year and a lift in the fuel excise, also raising $1bn a year.
• On the expenditure side there are likely to be net spending cuts of $3bn including a tightening of eligibility conditions for family tax benefits.
• The government will be able to announce this near term budget outcome as a considerable success by reducing the underlying deficit from 3.0% of GDP in 2013/14 to 1.6% of GDP in 2014/15.
• Given the strong rhetoric from the government in the lead up to the Budget these “savings” appear to be quite modest. However, they will be in line with the principles set out in the Committee of Audit which focuses on the medium term and returning the budget to a respectable surplus (1% of GDP) by 2023/24. Note that the near term spending savings envisaged by the Committee are modest: $2bn in 2014/15; $3bn in 2015/16; and $5bn in 2016/17.
• To identify the magnitude of that challenge we can look to the Committee’s sources of long term savings to reduce outlays by $60-$70bn per annum by 2023/24. The key sources of those savings are: pensions, $10bn; health, $20bn; family assistance, $7bn; foreign aid, $5bn; and $20bn from other programs including defence; schools; universities; industry assistance and government departments.
• The government will not adopt all of the initiatives suggested by the Committee, so the likely projected surplus is likely to be reached a little later than the Committee’s target of 2019/20. However, we expect the broad mix of savings to be quite similar.
• Westpac is in broad agreement with the government’s near term growth forecasts. Further, we do not believe that the new policies , including the levy, will make a meaningful impact on consumer spending.
• We also point out that the expected near term stance of the Budget will be significantly less contractionary than the first Howard/Costello budget in 1996. That budget included net savings over the 3 years of 3.1% of GDP compared with our estimate for this budget of 1% of GDP.

Full reports here.


  1. sydboy007MEMBER

    a 5% drop in the ToT. Tell them they’re dreaming, unless the RBA gets some cajones and starts to actively participate in the currency wars. Isn’t that way this years budget was blown out by $9B to give them some ammunition???

    When the ToT does fall not sure if motorists will like petrol close to $2/L and it will make exporting LNG even more lucrative so the east coast consumers can expect more pain. We don’t really make anything these days so not sure how we’ll overcome the inflation spike without major recession.

  2. The only good thing I can say is that Abbott does seem to be following the second half of Keynesian principles (ignoring that AUD is a fiat currency our governemtn issues at will): once the crisis (2008/9) is over, claw back towards surplus so there is capacity to deficit spend to maintain employment in the next crisis.

  3. Mosler and Forstater have written a paper on why the natural rate of interest on risk free (government) risk is zero.

    In it they discuss why governments like the Australian Commonwealth government don’t tax to fund because they issue a fiat currency.

    “Note that it would be logically impossible for the government to collect more than it spends (or run a budget surplus), unless it had already previously spent more than it collected (past budget deficits). Thus the normal budgetary stance to be expected under these institutional arrangements is a budget deficit.”

    IMO the whole construction of a budget is a political statement about whom the governemtn will make better off than they otherwise would be and whome they will make worse off thatn they otherwise would be. It is also about how to structure the economy at different stages as they progress towards the enxt election so they can retain the treasury benches and skew the economy in favour of their constituency.

  4. No mention in the budget or the Audit Report of a Super PROFITS TAX on the big 4 banks !!!!!
    OR cancelling all ex-pollies lurks and perks !!!!
    Until they do how can you take them seriously ?