Gina junior defends “welfare” Mum

Advertisement
gfrbv ew

From the AFR today, Gina Rinhart’s son, John Hancock, argues:

“Export credit agency funding ­certainly is not welfare – my mother is paying interest and buying hundreds of millions of dollars of American equipment – and is undoubtedly a significant benefit to the US, or why would they do the deal? It’s one of the toughest routes to project financing and she should be well congratulated for achieving a win for Australia and the US.”

I agree that the “welfare” argument is not much more than bitching.

Advertisement

It is also kind of true that export credit agencies are a difficult route to project financing in-so-far as they only exist to serve projects that can’t get private capital.

But, one could also turn that around and say that they’re a much easier form of financing given they apply looser criteria than markets do.

About the author
David Llewellyn-Smith is Chief Strategist at the MB Fund and MB Super. David is the founding publisher and editor of MacroBusiness and was the founding publisher and global economy editor of The Diplomat, the Asia Pacific’s leading geo-politics and economics portal. He is also a former gold trader and economic commentator at The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, the ABC and Business Spectator. He is the co-author of The Great Crash of 2008 with Ross Garnaut and was the editor of the second Garnaut Climate Change Review.