World Bank sees $1 trillion bill for rising seas

From the World Bank overnight:


Climate change, rapid urbanization, and subsiding land are putting the world’s coastal cities at increasing risk of dangerous and costly flooding, a new study calculating future urban losses from flooding shows.

The study, led by World Bank economist Stephane Hallegatte and the OECD, forecasts that average global flood losses will multiply from $6 billion per city in 2005 to $52 billion a year by 2050 with just social-economic factors, such as increasing population and property value, taken into account. Add in the risks from sea-level rise and sinking land, and global flood damage could cost $1 trillion a year  if cities don’t take steps to adapt.

Most coastal cities’ current defenses against storm surges and flooding are designed to withstand only current conditions. They aren’t prepared for the rising sea levels accompanying climate change that will make future floods more devastating, the authors write. Protecting these cities in the future will take substantial investment in structural defenses, as well as better planning, they write.

The findings add to a series of recent studies, led by the World Bank’s Turn Down the Heatreports, that have looked closely at expected rises in sea level and their impact on vulnerable regions around the world.

Who is most at risk?

The new study, part of an ongoing OECD project, examined maps and databases of population and world assets, flood-prone regions, storm frequency data, and cost of damage models for 136 large coastal cities. For the first time, it took into account existing coastal defenses and their level of protection.

In terms of the overall cost of damage, the cities at the greatest risk are: 1) Guangzhou, 2) Miami, 3) New York, 4) New Orleans, 5) Mumbai, 6) Nagoya, 7) Tampa, 8) Boston, 9) Shenzen, and 10) Osaka. The top four cities alone account for 43% of the forecast total global losses.

However, developing-country cities move up the list when flood costs are measured as a percentage of city gross domestic product (GDP). Many of them are growing rapidly, have large populations, are poor, and are exposed to tropical storms and sinking land.

The study lists the 10 most vulnerable cities when measured as percentage of GDP as: 1) Guangzhou, China 2) New Orleans, United States; 3) Guayaquil, Ecuador; 4) Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; 5) Abidjan, Cote d’Ivoire; 6) Zhanjing, China; 7) Mumbai, India; 8) Khulna, Bangladesh; 9) Palembang, Indonesia; and 10) Shenzen, China.

In most of these cities, the poor are most at risk as rapid urbanization has pushed them into the most vulnerable neighborhoods, often in low-lying areas and along waterways prone to flooding.

Taking action now

One warning from the study’s findings appearing in the journal Nature Climate Change is that the cities where flood risk will increase most are not the cities where the risk is particularly high today. Port cities that haven’t been highly vulnerable in the past are among those facing the greatest increase in risk by 2050. Leading the cities with the greatest increase in risk are Alexandria, Egypt; Barranquilla, Colombia; Naples, Italy; Sapporo, Japan; and Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.

“Coastal defenses reduce the risk of floods today, but they also attract population and assets in protected areas and thus put them at risk in case of the defense fails, or if an event overwhelms it. If they are not upgraded regularly and proactively as risk increases with climate change and subsidence, defenses can magnify – not reduce – the vulnerability of some cities,” Hallegatte said.

With better defenses, more people will be dependent on dikes and sea walls, and losses when those defenses fail to protect the city will get bigger. Along with better structural defenses, cities will need better crisis management and contingency planning, including early warning systems and evacuation plans, Hallegatte said.

In cities where flood damage hasn’t been common, spending money on flood defenses can be politically unpopular. The challenge facing government officials today is investing in protection before the damage occurs.

For small countries, protection and preparation are especially important. A devastating flood in a key city can stall the entire economy of a small country, making recovery and reconstruction even more difficult. For all of the cities, the preparation will save lives and money in the future.

David Llewellyn-Smith


  1. Looking at that map, I can’t help but think there will be a lot more boats heading towards Australia in 50 years time.

  2. bolstroodMEMBER

    More Boats? why? Do you think the same thing will not be happening here?

    Any way we will be harder to find with a reduced land mass

    • giving us 15 minutes to change comments makes ones like this seem worse because now we all know you had so long to think about it, and still haven’t seen the problem.

  3. migtronixMEMBER

    When exactly do I get that beach front property? It’s currently about 5ks out.

    On another note can’t we just let the Dutch run the UN? I’m pretty sure their dykes cost less than $1 trillion. Oh but how bankers just love to throw around orders of magnitude like 10^12, by the time their inflation is done it will more like 10^16

    • “I’m pretty sure their dykes cost less than $1 trillion.”

      I’m pretty sure that the Dutch coastline is smaller than the entire world’s coastline.

      • migtronixMEMBER

        Let me rephrase “I’m pretty sure the cost of the dutch dykes – amortized over the lifetime – once applied to the entire world’s coastline will cost less than $1×10^12”. And of course the “entire worlds coastline” is nonsense since not even close to the entire worlds coastline is inhabited – Europes coastline maybe…

  4. Perhaps we should see this as an opportunity?

    If Sydney is any guide, the people living very close to the the water are quite unpleasant.

    • It looks like the Great Green Flipper of the Earth Mother is about to lay down some serious smack on one of her most favoured sons.