So, Adam Carr is enjoying a spectacular victory lap having been the only one who dared contemplate a June rate rise. And fair enough too. Here’s is a sample:
The bottom line is that inflation is on the march – in addition to food, health costs are rising, as are the costs of education, rents, utilities, insurance, the list goes on. Consequently it is not really a relevant or a useful analytical contribution to point out that core inflation is only up 2.3 per cent year-on-year. The reason it’s at 2.3 per cent year-on-year is because of the anomalous outcomes we saw in the past three quarters. It is historical and that year-on-year figure is irrelevant in determining what trends are or what future trends might be – and the fact is the Reserve Bank’s target is not core inflation.
In my opinion the RBA should hike next week. The case is clear and there is no credible counter with the unemployment rate at 4.9 per cent, core inflation spiking and upstream price pressures surging. To suggest that the RBA can or should then sit around and wait now, for what I don’t know, with all the data where it is goes beyond hubris. The RBA has a job to do and they should just get on with it. In my opinion there is nothing left to wait for.
Well, that’s kind of true. Except, after a run of universally poor data for three months, we have had a recent breakout in four data points. The first was the April NAB survey, which showed labour costs potentially bottoming. The second was the March labor market data which was very strong and suggested pretty good gains across the nation. Last week we had good car sales and today, of course, the unsettling CPI. In my view that’s evidence of the economy emerging from its funk but it’s no slam dunk, especially coming on the back of the RBA’s intention to look through flood effects. But AC will have none of it:
Unfortunately I think there are just too many egos at stake here with most analysts arguing against the need for rate hikes – and that won’t change after today’s result. And of course I’m expecting a relentless PR barrage over the next few days – the usual stuff we get before every RBA meeting of retailer misery and consumer caution. The reality, we know, is much different with SUV sales at a record and sales of electronics etc very strong indeed. Consumer spending is and has been robust – prices are rising. So while I think the RBA should hike next week I still think June is still more likely given the political pressure the RBA is under from all directions. But I’ll talk more about that over coming days.
Glenn Stevens is a marvellously apolitical governor so we can discard AC’s “ego” idea as rubbish. And, once we get past the grandstanding, there are some analytical problems here. I accept the upstream costs argument if by that AC means oil. Strong car sales are to some extent flood related as Queensland showed a pop for replacements. Outside of that, however, consumer sales remain well below historic trends, especially in the household items AC singles out. It is one area of the economy still showing clear price deflation.
Today’s CPI release was about three things. Housing and construction-related inflation. Oil-related inflation. And flood-related inflation. The RBA has said repeatedly that it will look through the last. The construction and utilities components of housing are competing directly with the boom sector for resources. But it is a chronic problem that is keeping the CPI base permanently higher rather than a sudden problem. On oil, they can’t do much but will nonetheless see it as a generally inflationary force across everything. There is some offset, however, in the fact that because consumption is weak, petrol prices are also going to be deflationary. As we’ve illustrated several times, there is a very strong correlation between consumer confidence and oil prices.
None of these data points cast any further light on the central question of labour costs, which is the one that will be bothering the RBA most.
The Stevens RBA has been clear that it is most closely focussed on managing the medium term commodity boom, so the question you need to ask yourself is: will they see it as necessary to further deflate the services economy now to offset the inflationary forces, such as they are, before more commodity investment pours in?
He is also a former gold trader and economic commentator at The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, the ABC and Business Spectator. He is the co-author of The Great Crash of 2008 with Ross Garnaut and was the editor of the second Garnaut Climate Change Review.
Latest posts by David Llewellyn-Smith (see all)
- MB Fund celebration offer - January 25, 2020
- ADGSM review recommends gas reservation price trigger - January 24, 2020
- Did the Game of Mates kill Kaufland? - January 24, 2020