The Guardian self-destructs on immigration

Advertisement

The Australian’s Judith Sloan last week attacked the “shoddy” economic arguments used by those who favour large immigration numbers and open-border policies.

The canards identified by Sloan include the following:

  1. Recent high figures of net overseas migration (long-term arrivals minus long-term departures) are merely a catchup from the pause caused by Covid.
  2. The overall trend numbers are no different from the ones that the Morrison Coalition government had predicted.
  3. The problems in the housing market have nothing to do with the surge in the number of migrants.
  4. Any additional pressures on infrastructure and services are the result of poor planning, not because of the migrant intake.
  5. Any supposed loss of social cohesion is essentially the fault of those born in Australia and their intolerance to different cultures.

“Were a first-year economics student to serve up these falsehoods, they would fail”, argued sloan. “But open-border sympathisers/Big Australia advocates attempt to manipulate the numbers to push the line that there is nothing to see and there is no reason to reduce the migrant intake”.

The full text of this article is available to MacroBusiness subscribers

$1 for your first month, then:
Cancel at any time through our billing provider, Stripe
About the author
Leith van Onselen is Chief Economist at the MB Fund and MB Super. He is also a co-founder of MacroBusiness. Leith has previously worked at the Australian Treasury, Victorian Treasury and Goldman Sachs.