By Stephen Saunders
Donald Trump has said it direct to the United Nations—mass migration and net zero are toxic for Western nations. Can our “Liberal” party even grasp the nettle?
The smear of March for Australia and the sacking of Jacinta Price represent new lows for Australian “democracy”.
Vindictive Albanese Labor savaged the March, both before and after. Fellow-marchers and I are (takes deep breath) vile, un-Australian, ethnocentric, fascistic, far right, mansplaining, white supremacist, hate-filled, racists. Good to know.
Not content with these slurs, the government and allies found a new gutter of their liking.
That’s right, folks. Those who oppose mega migration—up to three-quarters of the electorate—are probably at best neo nazi dupes. Instead of Hitler allusions losing the argument, on this occasion, dear Adolf is deemed to win it.
Albanese has form, gladly allowing the anti-Voice majority to be defamed as racists. In what other wealthy or “democratic” nation does the leader and governing party openly defile their people as lowlifes? I’ve just been back to Japan again, where that kind of frontal abuse isn’t really a thing.
After the March, Liberal front-bencher Jacinta Price weighed in with the bleeding obvious. That Albanese Labor is prioritising Indian migrants to bolster its own vote.
This shouldn’t be controversial. Albanese has signed unorthodox agreements with his “Boss Modi”, giving India’s shaky qualifications and teeming student-migrants, an unprecedented inside run. In both Sydney and Melbourne, pro-Labor “Indian electorates” are being formed or stacked.
Like it or not, sectarian India is now Australia’s No. 1 preferred partner, for endless overpopulation. More Albanese “social cohesion” than ever before—not. As our Hindus “cohesively” duke it out with our Muslims.
Nevertheless, Price was forced out. Ostensibly, for refusing to pledge to leader Sussan Ley. In effect, for “hurting” our extra-virtuous Indian community.
Even at the back of the class, Ley has made it a bit obvious. Her progressive-apologist ticket is ineffectual. A Hastie-Price team or similar might at least offer a glimmer.
You might whinge, they’re not all-time talents. When chancers like Albanese and Julia Gillard can get written up as big national reformers, the bar’s not high.
“Neo nazi” March for Australia
Just to recap, the bipartisan elite that inflicts mega-migration upon disenfranchised voters is almost a closed system, one of mutual reinforcement and gratification.
The “mature debate” and respectful conversation that they urge upon voters are a cruel one-sided parody. This elite maintains their own curated set of overpopulation porkies that they ego-trip among themselves. These only get dumb and dumber:
“We have no controls, also it never happened, we’re fixing those visa-backlogs, we’re catching up for COVID, blame Peter Dutton, “better planning” will sort it, we’re up-skilling and de-ageing, finally we’re busting the congestion and decentralising, also who needs water, rapid population growth decouples from greenhouse emissions and environment, and lest we forget, you’re all racists.”
It was always a given that this comfortably entitled Big Australia silo would react venomously to any direct interruptions or unlikely protests from without.
However, the accusations that have been leveled over the past two months are absurd, disproportionate, and extremely dangerous. The elite is “punching down” at voters as never before.
Sure, to this elite, ordinary Australians are terribly racist, which is not actually true. But it’s the main pretext for why we’re not allowed to have low migration—unlike the great majority of the wealthy nations.
Now we’re complete dimwits too, with little capacity to resist the ominous “neo nazi” thugs who strong-arm us and poison our tiny minds.
Unlikely Jacinta Price
Carp as you will, the published platform and promos of March for Australia are straightforward and true. Business and the uni-party support mass migration, which exceeds the preferences of most voters.
Just for the record, we’re talking 75-80% higher in Albanese’s first term than Rudd’s huge three-year record. Five to six times the historical average.
These Labor “achievements” not being in dispute, no wonder Albanese and allies vigorously played the man (sorry, the non-binary diverse person) and not the ball. Dear Leader birthed his notorious good-people smear:
“Good people…look at who you were with…it isn’t actually about housing…it’s about sowing division…neo nazis have no role.”
They’re not good people, only fascists, barked Labor Minister Ed Husic. This was enough of a hint for Price to back off. Even after her sacking, however, she continues to urge low migration, citing Labor’s 1.2 million (quite an understatement) first-term immigration.
The silo’s response is what you’d expect—bigger lies more often. Net migration has fallen 40%, back to the “long term” average, Minister Burke fibs at the state-run ABC. We’ve reduced immigration from “record” Coalition highs, mugs Minister Leigh, also on the ABC.
Albanese’s own speech to the UN was equally predictable—a return serve of UN propaganda. It was Trump who spoke more for Albanese’s people.
Unlikely net zero
Linking mass migration and net zero, Trump understands these as two sides of the same pro-China coin. The UN coin that seeks to undermine Western prosperity.
It goes without saying, Albanese Australia is a world leader for unyielding devotion to mass migration and net zero.
Australia’s 45% population growth since 2000 is unmatched among wealthy nations. It comes off the back of a flagrantly misleading “climate risk” report. Now there’s our 62-70% emissions reduction target.
This is vanishingly unlikely, even upping Australia’s habitually creative climate accounting to the next level. But it’s extremely likely that Australia’s prosperity and living standards can be much damaged in the striving.
Net zero is a fallacy, not science. It is the latest distraction whereby Australian politicians can further depreciate the natural environment and local standards of living.
And yet, both the US and EU have reduced emissions. The former is largely due to switching fossil fuels, from coal to gas. In his speech, Trump referred to the latter unkindly.
Nevertheless, it’s also true that five global graphs—those for population, GDP or consumption, emissions, CO2 levels, and temperatures—keep trending upwards.
Yet through the UN alchemy of renewable energy and carbon capture, the sixth graph of “net” global emissions can cancel out China and India. And bend it like Beckham down to an imagined “zero”.
To rub it in, re-elected Albanese hosted a return visit from UN climate supremo and China apologist, bovver-boy Simon Stiell. Our ambitious climate target is a “no brainer” to reap “colossal” rewards. Or else we’ll have no fruit and vegetables.
Having lost its mind, Australian governance welcomes this UN grandstanding. Sure, Australian voters nominally want “climate action”. But they’re reluctant to pay for it and would rather have the cheap energy that Australia should have in spades.
For the Coalition, Trump is a unicorn
I amuse myself with listicles of unlikely “unicorns” that could potentially wean Australia away from its extraordinary reliance on Big Australia.
Examples include stakeholder insurgencies, exceptional leaders, environmental disasters, popular unrest, and international pressure.
But stakeholders invited to the treasurer’s roundtable were more Big Australia than ever. Exceptional leaders are few, with 90-95% of our 227 federal reps being “democratically” preselected to lean Big Australia. Australia’s environmental disasters count for nothing, while popular unrest is vehemently interdicted.
The UN, OECD, EU, and other international organisations exert negative pressure on Australia. Coalition, make no mistake, Trump is a unicorn.
The leader of the world’s most powerful economy has told UN HQ itself—open borders and net zero are toxic—a unique event unlikely to be repeated. And you have time; he’s in power through 2028.
Let’s hope he drums in the message if he meets Albanese on October 20. It’s not like the latter can have him sanctioned by his “Human Rights” Commission or “Race Commissioner”. Or smear him too as a neo-Nazi.
Meanwhile, Australia’s No. 1 gaslighter for mass migration, ANU’s Alan Gamlen, is getting cockier than ever. Now he claims Australia’s immigration-housing narco-state is “pre-political”, that is to say, entirely outside the political contest. He’s not that far wrong.
While even low-migration advocates still urge that ole respectful conversation and let’s blame the March. Respectfully, I disagree; only unicorns can do it.
Yeah, I know, Australians “dislike Trump”. The mini-Trump smear hurt Peter Dutton. But that was before Albanese, already the all-time Australian champ for inflaming homelessness and housing unaffordability, so openly disparaged his own people in favour of UN governance.
Adding to this March fallout, Trump and his pointed intervention present an unlikely opportunity for the Coalition to side with legacy citizens and not the UN. Which I rather hope they don’t spurn.
Let’s face it, however. To swim against the elite tide, Hastie-Price would need full samurai suits of armour as displayed in the Japanese museums.
