Bill Evans: RBA to hike multiple 50bps

Bill Evans is now cheering on the great Australian house price crash and subsequent recession with the rest of the world. Pass the popcorn!

Last week we lifted our forecast for the terminal US federal funds rate in December from 2.675% to 3.375%.

We now expect this more aggressive approach to see the US economy stalling, with the risk of a mild recession in the second half of 2023.We expect a need for a series of rate cuts from December 2023 eventually taking the federal funds rate back to 2.125% through 2024.

That cycle for the remainder of 2022 will entail increases of 75bps in July; 50bps in September; 25bps in November and 25bps in December.

This shift toward higher global rates has also led us to lift our terminal rate for the RBA’s tightening cycle, from 2.35% to 2.6%. Note that this is still significantly short of the market’s forecast terminal rate of around 4.5% and only a 25bp upward revision compared to the 75bp lift in the federal funds profile.

The 2.6% is broadly in line with the ‘2.5% guideline’ the RBA Governor has given in speeches and other commentary (from his ABC interview on June 14: “I think it’s reasonable that the cash rate gets to 2½ per cent at some point”).

The sensitivity of the Australian economy to the RBA cash rate is markedly higher than the sensitivity of the US economy to the federal funds rate. Around 60% of Australian mortgages are on floating rate terms with a further 75% of the remaining fixed rate loans set to mature by the end of 2023.

Effectively 90% of mortgage borrowers are directly exposed to moves in the RBA cash rate over the next year and a half. The rate affects borrowers and homeowners through multiple channels, including: the cash flow of existing borrowers; the capacity of prospective borrowers to obtain and service new loans; the wealth effect from associated adjustments in house prices; and via confidence effects.

In the US, the current surge in the mortgage rate only affects new borrowers directly as existing borrowers typically have fixed rate mortgages up to 30 years.

The more direct impact of the federal funds rate on financial assets in the US is through the equity market and confidence.

This 25bp upward revision in the forecast terminal rate is likely to manifest as a 50bp increase in the cash rate at the August Board meeting – revised up from our previous forecast of 25bps.

That would push the cash rate from our forecast 1.35% (following the expected 50bp lift at the upcoming July meeting) to 1.85% after the August meeting – firmly in our estimated ‘neutral zone’ for policy in Australia of 1.5-2.0%.

The August Board meeting will respond to what is expected to be a very unsettling June quarter inflation report set to be released on July 27.

We expect headline inflation to lift 1.5% in the quarter taking annual inflation from 5.1%yr to 5.8%yr. Underlying inflation, as represented by the trimmed mean, is expected to print 1.2% in the quarter for a lift in annual inflation from 3.7%yr to 4.5%yr.

We see the risks to these numbers to the upside.

After responding firmly to the further significant uplift in inflation – moving the cash rate into the ‘neutral zone’ and signalling a clear commitment to containing inflation and inflationary expectations – we expect the RBA to pause.

Consistent with our previous view, we expect the pause for two months to assess the impact of the rapid cumulative 175bp increase over four months.

As the Governor noted in this week’s speech to the American Chamber of Commerce, the key high frequency data he will be watching will be around consumer spending, particularly consumer durables and the housing market – not just house prices (as a pointer to wealth effects) but also with respect to dwelling construction and other housing-related expenditure.

It is noteworthy that a swift move to 1.85% will still only restore the cash rate to slightly above the 1.5% that held for nearly three years between August 2016 and May 2019, when inflation persistently undershot the Bank’s 2-3% target zone.

Moving swiftly to reverse what is clearly an over-stimulatory policy setting and then pausing before moving into the ‘contractionary zone’ is the best approach, and one that is most likely to avoid the damaging overshoot we are forecasting for the FOMC.

Such a strategy would also assist in the central objective of the tightening cycle: to signal clearly to economic agents – households and trade unions in particular – that the Bank is committed to returning inflation to target over the medium term, thereby containing any lift in inflation expectations.

In his speech, the Governor made a major point around the key objective of containing inflationary expectations.

Our central case remains that, following the release of the September quarter inflation report on October 26, a further tightening will be seen as necessary at the November Board meeting.

In that report we expect annual headline inflation to be steady at 5.7%yr (due in part to state government subsidies temporarily forestalling the effect of a big rise in electricity costs), but underlying inflation to have lifted from 4.5%yr to 4.8%yr.

The next move would put policy into the contractionary zone.

As such, it would be prudent to revert to proceeding in 25bp increments given the added uncertainty around the impact of each move.

We continue to expect a further move in December and a final 25bp lift at the February Board meeting in response to the December quarter inflation report.

The December quarter is expected to see the peak in both headline and underlying inflation. (6.6% and 4.8% respectively).

Having responded to that move it would be prudent to go on hold to assess the economy’s response to a cumulative increase in the cash rate over nine meetings of 250bp.

Such a move would be the second fastest tightening cycle since 1990, exceeded only by the 275bp increase over five meetings in the second half of 1994.

Our forecast is that, along with the clear slowing in the economy over the December and March quarters in particular, the March quarter inflation report will provide evidence that the slowing in demand and the freeing up of supply has brought demand and supply into closer alignment easing inflation pressures.

In the March inflation report we expect annual headline inflation to have fallen from 6.6%yr to 5.6%yr and underlying inflation to have fallen from 4.8%yr to 4.2%yr.

That evidence would be available by the May 2023 Board meeting, allowing the Board to move to a ‘wait and see’ approach, potentially signalling the end of the tightening cycle with the cash rate having reached 2.6%.

We also expect that the evidence around the sharp slowdown in the US economy will be a signal to the Board that steady policy is appropriate.

Markets have no sympathy with our view that the RBA can chart this course. They would point to the unsustainability of Australia’s cash rate settling 87.5bp below the federal funds rate.

Australia’s soft landing will allow the RBA to hold rates steady in 2023 and 2024 as inflation gradually eases back into the 2-3% target zone.

On our forecasts, after the FOMC is forced to reset policy in the aftermath of its economy stalling and potentially falling into recession, the RBA cash rate would settle around 50bps above the federal funds rate by the second half of 2024.

We accept that our forecasts for the cash rate assume a successful navigation of a very narrow path towards a soft landing.

In particular, the risks that we have seen recently with large increases in wage settlements are unsettling. That is why it is so important for the RBA to be decisive in the early stages of the tightening cycle with that clear message that it is committed to containing inflation risks.

A swift move into the neutral zone is a critical step and we strongly support adopting those three consecutive 50bp moves before a pause in September

Houses and Holes
Latest posts by Houses and Holes (see all)


  1. H and h. You are clearly missing one of the points here. The construction sector needs to be stopped. Trades which I am one are too busy. Way to busy. Aswell as that a rise in interest rates raises the cost of owning a second house which there could be as much as 300,000 in Australia.

    • Hill Billy 55MEMBER

      Agreed! When the construction sector is at 13% of GDP you know things are topsy turvy. Back in the old days it used to fluctuate between 6% in quite times and 9% in inflationary times. For it to be over double the bottom is just so extreme that something had to give. Unfortunately the pent up demand exacerbated by all the goodies (mates rates, FHB Grants etc etc) has cruelled the golden egg and turned it into a golden calf. And we know how that ended up!

  2. Fishing72MEMBER

    “ Effectively 90% of mortgage borrowers are directly exposed to moves in the RBA cash rate over the next year and a half.”

    I guess it matters fck all that effectively 100% of depositors have been exposed to and spit roasted by the RBA cash rate for the past five years?

    • Leroy Huggins

      Yes, note, as per the comment above.. there were many options available to you, to get what you were after (a financial return on investment), if the savings bank interest rate paid was below your target. Such an alternative does not exist for mortgagees paying off their family home. Renting is not an alternative (and no cheaper anyway), and in a nation with a pension system people keeping and retaining a roof over their head and for their family, IS more important than a person with enough wealth to care about the interest rate they receive, getting additional income.. especially when they could easily get that income stream via alternate investment choices.

    • pfh007.comMEMBER


      You are exactly right but I recommend referring to your “bank deposits” more accurately.

      What you are getting no return on is an unsecured investment in an industry that is so flakey and dodgy, the general public are denied any alternative safe and highly liquid form of saving to force them to “invest” in a bank.

      Were those, wishing to, “allowed” to operate a 100% safe and liquid reserve account at the RBA it would be quite reasonable to argue that they should receive no interest. No risk means no return.

      Allowing reserve accounts for all at the RBA would allow the public guarantee of unsecured bank investments to be removed.

      It would be very interesting to see what banks would have to offer to attract an unsecured investment without a public guarantee.

      A lot more than 1% I suspect.

      It is unfortunate that we have a manipulated privatised monetary system that is used to drive families deep into debt for shelter but it is wrong to blame those forced to prop it up with their savings.

      • It would be very interesting to see what banks would have to offer to attract an unsecured investment without a public guarantee.

        A lot more than 1% I suspect.

        This is a very interesting thought to entertain.

  3. MathiasMEMBER

    Cha Cha Chaaaaa Oiy Oiy … Cha Cha Chaaaaaa Oiy Oiy.

    Bugger… so this will be going for quite some time then.

    They should hold onto there houses for as long as possible. By taking longer to to figure all this out, they’ll get burned a lot more then and that’ll make me happy.

Leave a reply

You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in now