Build-to-rent wrecks housing affordability

Advertisement

MB has argued repeatedly that the ‘build-to-rent’ (BTR) model is a fake affordability cure given that it will add a cabal of profit-dependent corporations to the housing “market”, which will inevitably increase their already monstrous lobbying power and pricing power.

A new report in The AFR suggests our hunch is correct with recent Australian BTR projects charging a 20% premium on traditional rentals:

A Charter Keck Cramer analysis of advertised rents at Mirvac’s LIV Indigo BTR development in Sydney Olympic Park and rents for nearby private rental apartments shows the median one-bedroom, one-bathroom apartment rent is 19 per cent higher than an equivalent build-to-sell unit, while the difference was 27 per cent for a two-bed unit.

The full text of this article is available to MacroBusiness subscribers

$1 for your first month, then:
Cancel at any time through our billing provider, Stripe
About the author
Leith van Onselen is Chief Economist at the MB Fund and MB Super. He is also a co-founder of MacroBusiness. Leith has previously worked at the Australian Treasury, Victorian Treasury and Goldman Sachs.
Advertisement