What’s the trigger for more Chinese stimulus?

Advertisement

Wall Street is busy begging China to stimulate. It knows no other way. Yesterday Goldman Sachs was on its knees:

Looking beyond the immediate risks and uncertainties around Evergrande, we believe two other policy adjustments are also needed. First is the overall macro policy stance. Despite the recent increases in on-budget and off-budget fiscal spending and moreMLF/OMO liquidity operations than market expected in September, the overall domestic policy stance still appears too tight to us. Additional easing on both fiscal and monetary fronts is needed in Q4 to ensure sufficient growth momentum as we head into 2022. Second is the pace of structural changes. When it comes to long-term goals such as de-carbonization and property market deleveraging, the pace of policy implementation is as important as the ultimate policy objectives. In the case of deleveraging, both the2018 experience and the recent turn of events in the property market illustrate that, if the push to lower debt is compressed into too short a timeframe, growth may slow significantly and we may end up with a higher, not a lower, macro leverage.

Or, put another way, lower not higher stock and commodity prices.

The full text of this article is available to MacroBusiness subscribers

$1 for your first month, then:
Cancel at any time through our billing provider, Stripe
About the author
David Llewellyn-Smith is Chief Strategist at the MB Fund and MB Super. David is the founding publisher and editor of MacroBusiness and was the founding publisher and global economy editor of The Diplomat, the Asia Pacific’s leading geo-politics and economics portal. He is also a former gold trader and economic commentator at The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, the ABC and Business Spectator. He is the co-author of The Great Crash of 2008 with Ross Garnaut and was the editor of the second Garnaut Climate Change Review.