Mortgage brokers run off their feet

RBA Governor Phil Lowe last year endorsed Treasurer Josh Frydenberg’s proposal to axe responsible lending rules, telling the Standing Committee on Economics that Australian mortgage restrictions had become too strict and were constraining the economy:

“We can’t have a world in which, if a borrower can’t repay the loan, it’s always the bank’s fault. On a portfolio basis, we want banks to make some loans that actually go bad, because if a bank never makes a loan that goes bad it means it’s not extending enough credit”…

“The pendulum has probably swung a bit too far to blaming the bank if a loan goes bad”…

Lowe went on to say that the way the responsible lending legislation had been interpreted needed looking at:

“If we can’t do that properly, maybe we need to look at the legislation”.

Later in October, Lowe reiterated this view, stating that the removal of responsible lending rules “would support the supply of credit”.

Since these infamous claims, the notion that the supply of credit is constrained has been completely obliterated by the ABS’ lending data, which has reported the biggest ever boom in mortgage commitments:

New mortgage commitments

Australia’s biggest ever mortgage boom.

Mortgage brokers and banks are also run off their feet:

The nation’s banks are struggling to process an unprecedented number of new mortgages…

ANZ chief executive Shayne Elliott revealed his bank had wound back home loan marketing because demand was so strong while mortgage brokers said they were flat out…

Mr Elliott said his bank was struggling because of the “extraordinary” level of demand for housing over the past six months… “The volumes are unprecedented. We have not seen sustained high volumes like this ever before. When we built our machines, it was never imagined we would have to cope with these kinds of volumes every day of the week”…

“Brokers are flat out at the moment. Brokers have never been busier,” [Peter White, Finance Brokers Association of Australia managing director] said.

This doesn’t sound like an economy suffering from constrained credit, does it?

Of all Phil Lowe’s calls, his endorsement of Josh Frydenberg’s planned abolition of responsible lending rules must rank among the worst.

Unconventional Economist

Comments

  1. kannigetMEMBER

    The litmus test on this would be to ask Lowe, if he would loan you a small million out of his personal assets without doing an adequate background check to see if he was reasonably assured he was going to get his money back…

    Doesn’t matter that its a banks money so the risk is spread, in the end the public via government bailout that tends to bail the banks out when it goes bad, so there should be a moral imperative to apply some due diligence.

    • happy valleyMEMBER

      The government guarantee is essentially worthless and there is de facto depositor bail-in, so depositors will pick up the majority of any big bad debt hit. I wonder how much of his readies Captain Phil would risk with a Strayan bank?

  2. This is just the rationalisation of the new economic model of privatising profits and socialising losses. Everyone must be allowed to gamble as much as possible with everyone else’s money. It’s how wealth is built now days, don’t ya know.

    • New economic model?

      I didn’t realise Ronnie Reagan and Maggie Thatcher were still knocking about.

  3. GarethMEMBER

    Surely it doesn’t take that long to make up information for forms? Its not like the brokers or banks actually have to look the data up.

  4. Even StevenMEMBER

    So RBA is trying to juice economy. Has the other regulator (APRA) made any comment on removal of responsible lending rules?