Captain Phil touches down on Planet Earth

Good afternoon.

The Reserve Bank Board met this morning. It decided on a package of further measures to support the Australian economy as it recovers from COVID-19. Given the significance of this package, I wanted to explain in person what we are doing and why we are doing it and to answer your questions.

At its core, today’s decision reflects the Reserve Bank’s commitment to do what we reasonably can, with the tools that we have, to support the recovery of the Australian economy. The Board views addressing the high rate of unemployment as a national priority and it wants to do what it can to support job creation. Importantly, today’s decision complements government efforts to support the Australian economy and to lower unemployment.

When the virus first arrived on our shores, economic policy quickly turned to building a bridge to the recovery. This was the right strategy and this bridge has made a major difference to people’s lives, helping many people and businesses get through a very difficult period. This bridge was constructed through close co-operation by governments across Australia, the Reserve Bank, the financial regulators and Australia’s financial institutions. For the Reserve Bank’s part, we have kept borrowing costs low and the financial system very liquid and supported the supply of credit to the economy.

This broad economic policy response and Australia’s progress on the health front have meant that the Australian economy is in a better shape than many others. While Australians have experienced a severe recession, it has not been as bad as was earlier expected or experienced in many other countries.

In light of this experience, we have recently updated our economic outlook, with the full details to be published on Friday. These updated forecasts will contain an upgrade to the near-term economic outlook, although there are a number of factors weighing on the medium-term outlook, including lower population growth.

On balance, both the recent household spending and employment data have been a little stronger than we were expecting. It now appears probable that GDP increased solidly in the September quarter despite the lockdown in Victoria. And growth over the year to June 2021 is expected to be close to 6 per cent compared with an expectation of 4 per cent growth when we reviewed our forecasts three months ago. The fiscal support, including through the Budget, has played an important role here. The unemployment rate is also now expected to peak at a lower rate than previously – at a little below 8 per cent, rather than the 10 per cent expected three months ago.

This upgrade to the near-term outlook is clearly welcome news. At the same time though, we need to recognise that the pandemic has inflicted significant damage on our economy. It will take time to repair that damage and it is highly likely that the recovery will be uneven and drawn out. In particular, we face the prospect of a long period of higher unemployment and underemployment than we have become used to. In the RBA’s central scenario, job creation is slow over coming months and the unemployment rate is still around 6 per cent at the end of 2022. One consequence of this is that wages growth and inflation are both likely to stay very low. In each of the next two years, we are expecting annual wages growth of less than 2 per cent. And inflation, in underlying terms, is expected to be just 1 per cent next year and 1½ per cent in 2022.

Given this outlook, the Board judged that it is appropriate to take further steps today to support the economy. Unemployment is a major economic and social problem that damages the fabric of our society. So, it is important that it is addressed. The Board recognises that, in the context of the pandemic, the responsibility for job creation falls mainly on the shoulders of business and government. But the Reserve Bank can, and will, make a contribution too. Today’s policy package does that and it builds on the contributions from our policy measures earlier in the year.

Today’s package has three elements. These are:

  • first, a reduction in the cash rate target, the three-year yield target and the interest rate on new drawings under the Term Funding Facility to 10 basis points, from the current 25 basis points.
  • second, a reduction in the interest rate on Exchange Settlement balances to zero from the current 10 basis points.
  • and third, the introduction of a program of government bond purchases. In particular, we are intending to buy $100 billion of government bonds over the next six months, purchasing bonds issued by the Australian Government as well as by the states and territories.

Together, these three elements represent a significant package. The lower interest rates and our plan to buy $100 billion of government bonds over the next six months will help people get jobs and support the recovery of the Australian economy.

The package combines the price-based target at the shorter part of the yield curve that has been in place since March with a quantity target at the longer part of the yield curve. In doing so, it will lower the whole structure of interest rates in Australia. This lower structure of interest rates will work to support the economy through the normal transmission mechanisms, including lower borrowing costs, a lower exchange rate than otherwise and higher asset prices.

To be clear, the inflation target remains the cornerstone of Australia’s monetary framework. Even so, the priority over the next couple of years is jobs, with inflation risks remaining low. The RBA has a broad legislative mandate for price stability, full employment and the economic welfare of the Australian people. Today’s decision reflects that broad mandate.

The Board expects that this new lower level of interest rates will be in place for an extended period. The Board will not increase the cash rate until actual inflation is sustainably within the target range. It is not enough for inflation to be forecast to be in the target range. For inflation to be sustainably within the target range, wage growth will have to be materially higher than it is currently. This will require a lower rate of unemployment and a return to a tight labour market. On the current outlook, it will take some years to get there. Given this, the Board is not expecting to increase the cash rate for at least three years. It remains the case that prior to any increase in the cash rate target, the Board intends to remove the three-year yield target.

I would now like to provide some further details of the bond purchase program.

At the start, it is important to point out that all purchases will be made in the secondary market through an open auction process. The RBA will not be buying bonds directly from governments.

We plan to hold auctions three times a week: on Mondays, Wednesdays and Thursdays, with the first auction being on this Thursday.

On Mondays and Thursdays we plan to purchase bonds issued by the Australian Government (AGS) and on Wednesdays we plan to purchase bonds issued by the states and territories (semis).

We will focus on buying bonds with maturities of around five to 10 years, but may also buy bonds outside this range, depending upon market conditions. To assist with the smooth running of the auctions, we plan to buy AGS with five to seven-year maturities on Mondays and AGS with seven to 10-year maturities on Thursdays. For semis, we plan to alternate weekly between the five to seven and seven to 10-year securities, subject to market conditions.

We will be purchasing fixed-rate nominal bonds only, as these are the benchmark fixed-income securities in Australia and they underpin the pricing of many other assets. Inflation-indexed bonds are not part of the program.

The initial auctions for AGS will be for around $2 billion and the initial auctions for semis will be around $1 billion. This means that we expect to purchase around $5 billion per week.

We will closely monitor the impact of our purchases on market functioning and are prepared to adjust the size and timing of the auctions if necessary. If the size of these initial auctions is maintained, 80 per cent of the bonds purchased would be AGS and 20 per cent would be semis. In allocating our bond purchases across the various states and territories we will be guided by the stock of debt outstanding and relative market pricing.

These bond purchases mean that the RBA is now conducting quantitative easing, or QE, similar to that of many other central banks. I want to point out, though, that there has already been a very substantial increase in the size of our balance sheet as a result of our earlier measures. Once these additional bond purchases are completed mid next year, our balance sheet would have nearly tripled since the beginning of 2020, provided that the funds currently available under the Term Funding Facility are drawn upon.

I also want to point out that this bond purchase program is separate from any bond purchases that we undertake to support the three-year yield target. We remain committed to buying bonds in whatever quantity is needed to support that target. Any bonds purchased in support of the three-year yield target will be separate from the $100 billion.

I would now like to address four specific questions that I know some people would have. I will then answer questions more broadly.

These four specific questions are:

  1. Why make this change now?
  2. Is the RBA now financing the government?
  3. Why have a price and a quantity target?
  4. With interest rates so low, is the RBA now out of fire power?

Why make these changes now?

This is an understandable question, especially given that we are easing monetary policy further today at the same time as we are upgrading the near-term outlook for the economy.

Apart from the general case for further monetary easing that I have already spoken about, there are a couple of other factors that have influenced the timing.

The first is that over recent months we have learnt more about the pandemic and its economic impact. As the months have passed, it has become increasingly apparent that there will be long-lasting effects, including high unemployment. While the outlook does remain uncertain, we do have a somewhat clearer picture of the future state of the labour market. A sharp bounce-back in jobs is unlikely and it will take time to return to where we were before the pandemic. We have responded to this clearer picture today.

The second factor is that monetary easing is likely to get more traction today than it would have when widespread restrictions were in place. In earlier months, the usual transmission mechanisms were not working as normal and the challenges facing the country were best addressed by other policy tools. However, as restrictions are eased and people have more opportunities to spend, our judgement is that further monetary easing now provides additional support to other policies, including the fiscal initiatives and the RBA’s earlier monetary policy package.

In reaching today’s decision, the Board also considered the effects on medium-term financial and macro stability as well as the impact on savers. The Board recognises that low rates can encourage some additional risk-taking, as investors search for yield. It also recognises that low deposit rates can create difficulties for some people. These issues will need to be closely watched over the months ahead. But the Board judged that the bigger risk at the moment was the threat to our economy and to balance sheets from an extended period of high unemployment. Today’s decision will lessen that risk.

Is the RBA now financing the government?

The answer is a simple no. Today’s decision does not change the long-standing separation of monetary policy and fiscal financing in Australia. The RBA is not financing government spending.

I want to highlight the important distinction between providing finance and affecting the cost of that finance. The RBA is not providing finance to the government, but our actions are lowering the cost of government finance. I should point that our actions are also lowering the cost of finance for all other borrowers in Australia, whether they are a household buying a home or a business wanting to expand. This lower cost of finance for everybody is supporting the recovery from the pandemic.

It is important to point out that the bonds purchased by the RBA will have to be repaid by the government at maturity. They will have to be repaid in exactly the same way as would occur if the bonds were held by others. The same is true for the ongoing coupon payments on the bonds. The fact that the RBA is holding some bonds makes no difference to the financial obligations of the government, other than through a lower cost of finance.

The Australian Government and the states and territories continue to fund themselves in the market, as they should. Raising funds in the market is an important discipline and movements in market prices can contain valuable information. Recent bond auctions have been heavily oversubscribed, even though the size of these auctions has been a record high. There is strong demand by domestic and global investors for bonds issued by the Australian Government and by the states and territories. I expect that this will remain the case.

Why have a price and a quantity target?

As part of the RBA’s March package, we announced a price target for the yield on the three-year Australian Government bond, rather than a quantity of bonds to purchase. We viewed the yield target as the more direct way of achieving our objective of low funding costs. The target also reinforced our forward guidance regarding the cash rate. Given that we expected the cash rate to remain low for some years, we judged it appropriate to target a three-year yield and stand behind that target with our balance sheet.

These arguments for a yield target remain valid and so we are continuing with the three-year yield target. We considered targeting a longer yield – say five years – but decided against this. This was on the basis that the yield target is most effective when it is consistent with our forward guidance on the cash rate. As I said earlier, we expect the cash rate to be at its current level for at least three years. Beyond that, we have less confidence. I certainly hope that the economy will be sufficiently strong sometime over the next five years to warrant an increase in the cash rate. So three years, not five years, is the appropriate maturity for the yield target.

Today’s decision supplements this price target with a quantity target further out along the yield curve. This quantity target is similar to the approach adopted by many other central banks, which have responded to the pandemic with government bond buying programs. The evidence is that these programs have lowered government bond yields in other countries. One result of this is that Australia has had higher long-term bond yields than elsewhere, even though the setting of the short-term policy rate is similar across countries. These higher bond yields have added to the attractiveness of Australian dollar assets and this has put some upward pressure on the exchange rate.

There has also been an accumulation of evidence that central bank balance sheet expansion has a stimulatory effect beyond that resulting from lower bond yields. When the central bank buys assets, investors in the private sector adjust their portfolios, buying different assets with the proceeds of their bond sales. This portfolio rebalancing can affect the price of other assets and international capital flows, as well as the exchange rate.

Given these considerations, the Board judged it was now appropriate to combine the three-year yield target with QE further out along the yield curve.

Is the RBA now out of firepower?

The short answer here again is no. The Reserve Bank is not out of firepower. We have additional monetary policy options and we are prepared to use them if the circumstances require.

In terms of interest rates, I think we have gone as far as it makes sense to do so in the current environment. There has been no change to the Board’s view that there is little to be gained from lowering the policy rate into negative territory. While a negative rate might lead to a helpful depreciation of the Australian dollar, it could impair the supply of credit to the economy and lead some people to save more, rather than spend more. Given this assessment, the Board continues to view a negative policy rate in Australia as extraordinarily unlikely.

But monetary policy is now about more than just short-term interest rates – we have returned to a world in which quantities matter too. In this world, it is certainly possible for us to increase the size of our bond purchases. Given this, we will continue to closely monitor the economic situation and the impact of our purchases on market functioning. If we need to do more, we can and we will.

The RBA also has a range of tools to support the proper functioning of markets and address market dysfunction were that to occur. These tools include further liquidity provision, asset purchases and transactions in the foreign exchange market.

So it would be incorrect to conclude that we are out of firepower.

That brings me to the end of the four questions I posed. I am now happy to answer any other questions that you might have.

Thank you.

Sadly, Captain Phil had to spoil his great day with drivel about not financing the government and no negative rates which has now lifted pressure on the AUD.

But, the open-ended commitment to bond purchases is still good and will weigh on the currency for as long as it is in place.

Ten years late, the RBA has arrived on Planet Earth.

David Llewellyn-Smith


  1. Actually it’s all about the confidence of your average schmuck. If they feel that we’re over the worst of COVID, BAU is about to start up, the property market is booming again and intrest rates are going nowhere but down, then why not go buy a house!!!????
    Better to get in now before prices get any higher, FOMO at it’s finest!

  2. happy valleyMEMBER

    Absolutely, other the RBA happy clappies, Bill Evans and DL-S will have orgasms of delight, which makes it all worthwhile.

  3. pfh007.comMEMBER

    “..When the central bank buys assets, investors in the private sector adjust their portfolios, buying different assets with the proceeds of their bond sales. This portfolio rebalancing can affect the price of other assets and international capital flows, as well as the exchange rate…”

    You know Governor Phil is talking about the mums and dads and the working stiffs.

    Tonight they will be sitting around their kitchen tables wondering which of the assets in their portfolios they will sell to Government Phil and what other existing assets they will bid up with the proceeds.

    We have mainstream economic lunacy being paraded openly and all the “economics herd” can do is nod sagely and ponder what the next dose of double down might be.


    • And they surely can.
      When their next TD matures and they face the choice of rolling it at 0% if they aren’t happy with the yield they can then sell it in exchange for a holiday on the gold coast.

      • pfh007.comMEMBER


        Let’s get this straight.

        Your argument in support of your position is that it is a good thing for the central bank to drive the returns on unsecured investments in private banks to zero because some people might become so disenchanted at those returns that they will blow the money on a holiday on the gold coast.

        No wonder you are struggling to understand what is going wrong with your prescriptions.

        What most people do when they realise that their investments are producing no return is to desperately look for an investment that does produce a return and that is NOT a holiday on the gold coast.

        What they do is leverage up and punt on asset prices.

        Mostly the prices of existing assets.

        An exercise that not only generates little economic activity and little of which that is productive but it results in the “glut” of deposits in the possession of rich people that you KEEP moaning about.

        AND the entire time you steadfastly ignore (as do a few others) my very simple and effective MyRBA proposal which would address many of the problems we are facing as it involves distributing money at the bottom and allowing it to trickle up.

        • “that they will blow the money”

          See that’s your overall working assumption. That consumption is a waste of money.

          “What they do is leverage up and punt on asset prices”

          Money goes *through* asset markets it doesn’t go into asset markets.
          Yes so some people move further out the risk/yield curve, where others previously happy with their yields move further out where others previously happy decide they feel wealthier now/ or throw in the towel and go to the gold coast.

          Leverage thing – we already established the other day why that is wrong.

        • pfh007.comMEMBER

          “..See that’s your overall working assumption. That consumption is a waste of money…”

          No that was in response to your absurd claim that people faced with a manipulated zero return on their invested capital will suddenly decide to consume the capital.

          Why would they do that?

          Why would people who have set aside capital for investment decided to consume rather than conserve that capital when the central bank manipulates the return on the capital?

          It certainly explains why you are such a fan of inflation.

          You hope that will drive people to spend their capital before it is corroded by inflation.

          And you complain that this is all Murdoch’s fault?

          You are promoting the demented centralised lever pulling school of economics that is causing the problems we face.

      • Based on my experience, they will double up on saving. 4% IR they need 1M for retirement. Zero IR, now they “need” 3M.

        • MB’s position on interest rates always reminds me of David Icke’s views on lizard people. He makes a lot of sense but there’s that one thing he said a long long time ago and is now stubbornly committed to it. And it’s the main reason why I just pop by here and don’t subscribe. It’s a shame because otherwise MB does so much good and I agree with them, but that policy they stick to has destroyed the nation.
          Low interest rates = high house prices.


          • Hard to disagree with that.
            Some of the calls on here have been out of the box; without peer. But just a few have that nagging feeling of contradiction. Your comment highlighting one such case.

  4. maybe – but those animal spirits in the property industry will be frothing like reusa near baby oil.

  5. Don’t worry, the “financing the government” bit will come soon enough.
    One thing we now know – these guys aren’t afraid of a backflip when painted into a corner

  6. Well Captain Phil being a space cadet for years he had to touch down to Earth eventually .. ” This ground control to Captain Phil, thankyou for finally not being a dill”.

  7. Reus's largeMEMBER

    Captain FCUKWIT says the RBA is doing it’s bit to pump house prices so go out there and get some debt to make you better looking !

  8. Buying longer dated bonds won’t do much for easing monetary conditions. Very few borrow long tenors and the government may be better funded but they aren’t going to increase spending just because bond yields drop 10bp.

    We could see a small lift in asset prices from the lower longer term yields and it may weigh slightly on the AUD, but it’s pretty inefficient.

    If they want to really help ease monetary conditions, add foreign assets to the LSAP and drive down the A$

  9. “Is the RBA now financing the government? The answer is a simple no. Today’s decision does not change the long-standing separation of monetary policy and fiscal financing in Australia. The RBA is not financing government spending.”

    EXCUSE ME but that is EXACTLY what the RBA is doing.

    So the purchase of these bonds is funded by what?????

    ANSWER = money printing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • But the government is already fully funded when they buy the bonds because they are bought on the secondary market.
      So the private sector is still 100% financing the government.

      • So the central bank tells everyone it will bonds off them to encourage people to continue to buy government bonds? Rather than just paying the government directly? But the RBA money is not being used to finance the government because there’s a middleman?

        Isn’t that like me paying my friend $100 so he can pass $90 of that onto his friend? But hey, I’m not in anyway helping to fund his friend.

        • No it is very different.
          Treasury is already fully funded right now at market rates of interest.

          If the CB is buying bonds on the secondary market there is no link between the flow rate of the deficit and the purchase of bonds.
          For example: if the budget wasn’t in deficit the CB could still buy the bonds.

          Once bought the CB can either sell the bond to the private sector or let it mature and run off the balance sheet, either way this will reduce Treasury’s cash held in its deposit account at some point in the future.
          So it *isn’t* permanent or inflationary finance.

          To be monetary financing, the CB would be crediting the Treasury’s deposit and taking up some sort of non-interest IOU with no maturity in sync with the deficit flow.

          • So how long before the guy on the other side of the trade gets peeved that his counterpart can print his own money? Answer: Never. So long as he is already heavily invested in the market and his assets keep going up and up and up. Hence the cantillion effect and who loses? All those outside the cabal using the same money. It is an abuse of trust plain and simple.

    • pfh007.comMEMBER


      The word money printing is not helpful.

      A better description is that the RBA is creating central bank liabilities out of thin air and it uses those to buy bonds that banks have bought from treasury. That results in an increase in the banks reserves (on which interest should not be paid but is).

      But that is not the end of the story as when the general public start presenting the cheques they have received from the government the RBA starts selling bonds back to the banks to reduce the banks reserves.

      The banks get interest on the bonds and interest on their reserves. The RBA just adjusts the mix to manipulate interest rates and they do that to manage the volume of debt peddling by the banks.

      It is the debt peddling by the banks that is the real money printing.

      The above process doesn’t actually result a large expansion of the central bank balance sheet so in that sense there is not a lot of money printing (Central Bank liability creation)

      What actually happens is worse. What would otherwise be a non interest paying central bank liability has become an interest accruing government bond.

  10. Hey I have an idea, lets do what the US are doing, which is what Europe are doing which is what Japan did which failed miserably and can’t figure how to get out of the hole they dug for themselves.

  11. Look now, look all around, there’s no sign of life
    Voices, another sound, can you hear me now?
    This is planet earth you’re looking at planet earth
    Bop bop bop bop bop bop bop bop this is planet earth