RBNZ demands more bank capital

More capital from the Aussie ponziteers:

The Reserve Bank’s – Te Pūtea Matua – latest stress test of New Zealand’s banks illustrates the benefit and necessity of shoring up bank capital in the good times to provide resilience. The COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated that large shocks can occur with very little warning.

“The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic provides a stark reminder to us all of the importance of being prepared for the unexpected, especially when you are a systemically important bank at the core of New Zealand’s financial system. The more capital a bank holds, the better it can weather economic storms and meet customer needs during tough times like now.” Deputy Governor Geoff Bascand says.

“Our stress test assess the impact of significant, hypothetical, economic downturns on the profitability and capital of the largest banks in New Zealand. The results show us that banks can, and should, draw on their capital buffers to continue meeting customers’ needs during very challenging economic times.

“Our base case stress test scenario assumes that the unemployment rate rises to 13% and the level of New Zealand’s annual GDP falls by 12%. The scenario also assumes a significant negative impact on property prices, the largest lending destination for banks.

“Given the strong, regulated, starting point of bank capital, banks are able to continue their lending activity in this scenario. This best ensures they will play an important part of the economic recovery in New Zealand, rather than be a further source of concern by unnecessarily restricting access to credit.

“We also test a more severe economic scenario, which assumes unemployment rises to around 18%, and we experience an 18% decline in the level of GDP. Under this scenario, banks come under considerable strain, and would need to access additional capital to remain above their regulatory minimums”, Mr Bascand says.

“Even though these scenarios are severe, they are not unprecedented internationally, and the economic costs of such bank failures are significant.

“There is a limit to the comfort these stress tests provide, given that they are only simulated. In particular, the user knows how the stress ends and can act rationally. This is not the case in real time. The more bank capital there is, the less the banks and the New Zealand economy are exposed to the risks of decision making under uncertainty” Mr Bascand says.

Marvelous. Sack Deflation Phil. Slam RBA and APRA together. Sack the deadwood and put an RBNZ alumnus in charge.

David Llewellyn-Smith

Comments

  1. happy valleyMEMBER

    The RBNZ realises how questionably strong their banks are, whereas our regulators assume ours are unquestionably strong and even during the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression, ease the prudential requirements on our banks. Doh!!!

    • “Our” NZ banks are your banks. Questioning their strength doesn’t actually change their fragility.
      ANZ, ASB(CBA),BNZ (NAB) and Westpac – all Australian banks – comprise 90% of the banking system here.
      What happens in Australia won’t bypass here.

      • happy valleyMEMBER

        Sure, but at least your RBNZ realises how questionable Strayan banks are and that it has to make the NZ subsidiaries as self-reliant as possible. And also, as you have explicit depositor bail-in laws as distinct from our underhand implicit bail-in situation, the RBNZ is presumably going through the process of at least making it seem like your banks have enough capital (rather than a “house of cards”) to forestall a potential bail-in. The bankers’ maxim in reality is: no care, no responsibility?

      • so we should expect 90% of NZ’s banking system to leave NZ in revolt for this “unfair” treatment.

    • In the parlance of the RBA and our pollies, “unquestionably” means “please don’t ask questions about it”.