Anti-lockdown proponents dills

Advertisement

Could not agree more. At FTAlphaville:

When considering which measures are appropriate for tackling coronavirus, and which should be eased first, it’s crucial that we think seriously about the various trade-offs that we are making, and the potential collateral damage wreaked by various strategies.

Clearly, there will be massive effects from the lockdowns imposed to varying degrees across much of the world, including severe economic damage that will indirectly have a significant negative impact on health, as well as direct health damage — both physical and mental — that comes from being locked up indoors for weeks or months on end (a problem that is likely to be particularly acute in lower-income countries).

The full text of this article is available to MacroBusiness subscribers

$1 for your first month, then:
Cancel at any time through our billing provider, Stripe
About the author
David Llewellyn-Smith is Chief Strategist at the MB Fund and MB Super. David is the founding publisher and editor of MacroBusiness and was the founding publisher and global economy editor of The Diplomat, the Asia Pacific’s leading geo-politics and economics portal. He is also a former gold trader and economic commentator at The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, the ABC and Business Spectator. He is the co-author of The Great Crash of 2008 with Ross Garnaut and was the editor of the second Garnaut Climate Change Review.