How to create a $47bn WeWork in one easy step

This is a message for those who want to avoid being ripped off by aspire to be investment bankers. One dirty secret (of many) in investment banking is valuations are an advertising tool. If you can’t manipulate valuations to get the number your boss wants you to get, you are in the wrong game. How else can WeWork be worth $47bn one week and then $5bn the next?

For example, here are two valuations that use the “same” assumptions:

How to manipulate a discounted cashflow valuation

As you can see in the second table, we have hidden as much as possible behind the decimal point: 

How to manipulate a valuation: decimal places

Let me re-iterate:

I have just shown you how to more than double a valuation by using nothing more than creative rounding of assumptions.  

By the end of this article, I expect you will be able to argue convincingly why a company like WeWork with a few serviced offices serving free beer and losing $1bn is, in fact, a tech company worth $47bn.

Work Backwards

First, choose your valuation. This is going to save you a lot of time. 

Ordinary investors like to put in the assumptions and use the valuation as an output of their model. They want to use valuations to compare between different companies, assessing which will generate the best returns.

But let’s not beat around the bush. You want to be an investment banker. You aren’t here to evaluate investments. You are here to make a bonus for your boss.  If your boss needs a $47bn valuation, then start with that number and work backwards to the assumptions to get you there. Besides, your client already knows how much they want to sell the business for. Your boss’s next yacht depends on this (Aside: the fact you are the junior investment banker doing the numbers means you won’t be getting the yacht. But hey, one day, you might be!). Don’t let good practice (or your conscience) stand in the way of achieving that goal. 

Comparative Multiples

Comparative multiples are where you take several companies and compare them to the company that you want to list. It goes without saying that you want to find the most attractive comparisons.

Some investors don’t like to compare companies with different business models, i.e. service companies vs manufacturers. Some investors note that large companies trade at a premium to small companies. Some investors note that different geographies have different regulatory, competitive or tax environments. Don’t let that bother you. You are going to compare your company to whatever puts it in the best possible light.

What profit measure to compare?

The first thing you need to do is to choose which valuation ratio you are going to use. Only a rookie would want a price / reported earnings ratio: the word “reported” implies audits, signed off accounts and a paper trail. Far better off to go with a non-GAAP / non-IFRS number where you can adjust your way to the valuation you need. 

An EBITDA multiple is usually your best option. EBITDA stands for… actually don’t worry about what it stands for – you may need plausible deniability at some stage. Just know Charlie Munger says:

I think that every time you see the word EBITDA, you should substitute the word ‘bullshit’ earnings.

If you don’t think that is a ringing endorsement, then you have chosen the wrong career. 

EBITDA is a non-GAAP / non-IFRS number which means you are only constrained by your imagination/conscience. As an aspiring investment banker that should mean you are only limited by your imagination. 

Basically, to get to EBITDA, you start with profit and then take out whatever you like. Best way, make two piles: 1) positive things that added to profit and 2) negative things that detracted from profit. Don’t worry about pile 1 – they are all staying in, regardless of whether they are repeatable or not. Your goal is to get rid of as many of the things in pile 2 as you can. 

As an example, WeWork created a new term “Community Adjusted” EBITDA – stripping out marketing costs, startup costs, legal costs, share-based expenses and depreciation. Because what company ever needed those? 

Sales Multiples

Sales multiples are a last resort for the genuinely unprofitable companies. The problem with sales is that it is hard to fake. 

It isn’t impossible, mind you, it is just that your auditor will either need to be asleep at the wheel or willing to risk their licence for you. 

By the way – kudos to one recent company who tried to account for lease discounts as revenue. Truly awe-inspiring work. Even veteran investment bankers choked on their cornflakes smashed avocado on artisanal sourdough toast when they saw that one. Respect.

Time is merely a social construct

The great philosopher Ford Prefect once said: “Time is an illusion“.   Use this illusion wisely.

WeWork goes for “run rate revenue” – the most recent month times twelve. You are only as good as your latest hit, right?

You can also mix and match time periods to suit. Most respected analysts are quite anal about comparing time periods that match, re-adjusting balance dates in order to get a fair comparison. No reason that should apply to an investment banker’s comparison. 

Does your company have irregular costs or revenues? Have a think about changing your balance date – maybe you can load all your good months into one twelve-month period. Or, maybe you can banish negatives into “the year before last”. And who cares about what happened in such a distant past.

Pro forma accounts are your best friends

Pro forma sounds way more technical than “made up accounts”. But they are. Don’t forget the woulda/shoulda/coulda adjustments. These aren’t the actual profits, they are the profits that woulda/shoulda/coulda been if everything was always perfect and nothing ever went wrong.

Did the company shut down anything recently? Allocate any cost you possibly can to that closed-down division. Then remove it entirely from the accounts except for an obscure footnote. 

Oh, and while you are at it, also allocate as many costs as you can to head office, and then strip head office cost allocations out of your report and never speak of them again.

Spin-offs and tax decisions

If you are spinning off or selling a subsidiary of a foreign company, you are going to need to get the accounts redone. 

Start with the reports you presented to the local tax authorities and get all of the assumptions the company made to create the accounts. 

Then, for your listing, simply change every assumption to the exact opposite. Depreciating assets over 3 years for the purposes of tax? Better to spread that out over 10 years for the market. Charging interest rates of 9% back to your closest tax haven? Pretend it was 2%. Expensing R&D? Better to capitalise R&D before you list and let shareholders worry about the depreciation after you have sold the company.

In fact, capitalise anything you can get your hands on for prior years – interest expenses, software, customer databases, whatever you can. If you are really sneaky, you might be able to slip in a write-down of all of those things before listing. But if you can’t, don’t worry too much. Once you have sold the company, they will be someone else’s problem. 

Final adjustment to comparables

Now that you have a dirty clean number to compare to the company’s competitors, you can start finding the comparables.

Median, market cap weighted average, straight average. There are good reasons why real investors use one rather than the other. I won’t waste your time with the details. As an investment banker, calculate them all and take the maximum. Or minimum. Whichever. Getting closer to the number you want is what’s important.

And remember pile 1 and pile 2? No reason why (except moral ones) you can’t do precisely the opposite to your comparable numbers. This is a great place to hide adjustments – the smarter investors will be busy checking all of the modifications you have made to the earnings of the company you are listing. But even intelligent investors will often forget to check the adjustments you make to comparable earnings. Don’t let this opportunity pass you by. 

Discounted Cashflows

I have already shown you how to double a valuation using no more than the rounding of your assumptions. 

Discounted cashflows are far more “flexible” than comparative valuations. First, they are in the future, and so you can make up pretty much whatever you want.

They are based on free cash flow. A glorious term that has many competing definitions, and so use whatever you want. If we run into trouble, I’m sure the lawyers will be able to find a definition somewhere of free cash flow that matches yours.

And best of all there are so many places like risk-free rates, risk premiums, beta, short term growth rates, long term growth rates that can all be used to tweak a valuation up or down. 

Wholesale and Accredited Investors

Another great term. The marketing department deserves congratulations on creating these. 

Basically, Wholesale/Accredited investors think they are getting “special access” to deals that regular investors can’t.

What Wholesale/Accredited investors are really getting is access to a deal with far fewer legal protections around things like the truth and fair comparisons. There is far less chance of you going to jail for something limited to Wholesale/Accredited investors so take full advantage. They want to play with the big kids? Welcome to the playground.

Final Word

Make sure to use all of the tools at your disposal. If you bury all your integrity in one grave, it is too easy to discover and too disturbing when it is found. 

If you scatter the remains of your valuation’s integrity far and wide then you will have more chance of slipping it past the average investor.  

————————————-

Damien Klassen is Head of Investments at the Macrobusiness Fund, which is powered by Nucleus Wealth.

The information on this blog contains general information and does not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. Past performance is not an indication of future performance. Damien Klassen is an authorised representative of Nucleus Wealth Management, a Corporate Authorised Representative of Nucleus Advice Pty Ltd – AFSL 515796.

Follow me

Damien Klassen

Damien has a wealth of experience across international equities (Schroders), asset allocation (Wilson HTM) and he helped create one of Australia’s largest independent research firms, Aegis Equities. He lectured for over a decade at the Securities Institute, Finsia and Kaplan and spent many of those years as the external Chair for the subject of Industrial Equity Analysis.
Follow me

Latest posts by Damien Klassen (see all)

Comments

    • Stewie GriffinMEMBER

      It is a good article, very good example on impact of rounding.

      Personally my favorite starting point/metric when I look at any Company is OPERATING Cashflows… the larger the gap between those and EBITDA the less comfortable I become.

      Obviously there will be exceptions, especially for start ups (WeWorks was basically a Real Estate company, I could never accept it through an IT valuation lens), but as a starting point Free Operating Cashflow is a good starting point.

      • A guy I used to work with, who became a bigwig at hedge fund GLG for a time, said (several in a research piece a few years ago) that if you actually valued the companies in the S&P500 based on the hard cash they generated, the S&P should trade around 450 to 500. Today the S&P500 is at 3076. It beggars belief that people think stocks are fair value right now.

  1. Very good.

    Can you write a piece on: “You Want to Be a Fund Manager, and tie your bonuses to both generating a result in line with other Fund Managers, and maintaining flow of client funds”.

    • Damien KlassenMEMBER

      Sorry.
      If the MB Fund model with complete transparency / no performance fees doesn’t work out then I’ll need to go back to working for someone else…
      Maybe when we have a little more under management.

    • Or tie this article into a “How to be an investment manager of unlisted assets” follow up.

      • There is nothing wrong with investing in unlisted assets – just don’t promise your clients liquidity that you cannot deliver.

        Many of the best investment opportunities are in the unlisted space right now given the volume of cheap money that’s inflated the listed space.

        • Problem is the hunt for yield is sending that cheap and dumb money in to bid down yields on illiquid assets. Commercial property, aged care, childcare, student accommodation are all ripe for a big fall

  2. And what did the other philosopher Ford say; the one who made the cars that the other one hitchhiked in?
    “It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning.”

    • And that was said back in the days before banking became seriously egregious.

      But it’s true and remains so today. I wish the average Joe understood but I think it highly unlikely they ever will.

      • I think europeans are starting to wise up and become more aware about how the backing system works, or doesn’t work. Its been a tough decade and people really started to ask questions. Here not so much

  3. Seen this magic trick with canva recently. Also have recently had some experience and insight into the tech funding landscape and weirdly enough if you have a conservative figure of your funding needs and your valuation while you try to contain costs, you wont get looked at. Honestly, it better to have 2 twenty something ‘entrepreneurs’ that have dropped out of uni with no prototype and no idea on how to make the tech work throw around billion dollar figures here there with a chart of unicorns taking flight to get looked at

  4. Great to someone recognising the brilliance of Douglas Adams…

    Meanwhile, the moral of the story is “never buy anything from Private Equity”.

  5. Loved this article. Haven’t laughed so much for a while.
    Remember years ago doing due diligence on some company & pretty much concluded it was totally insolvent. (I recommended appointing receivers!). Went to meeting & spin/spiv CEO wouldn’t let me put anything on the table & said paper & documents looking at the past (i.e.facts!) were distracting from the rosy future. Spiv had better looking charts beamed on the wall with the graph going to the moon. Upshot:- Investors piled in, spiv got his money, company collapsed within 12 months, investors lost the lot & even had ASIC crawling all over the place due to suspected insolvent trading.