Hong Kong international students intimidated by angry Chinese

The fallout from last month’s protests at the University of Queensland, which saw nationalist Chinese students attack Hong Kong students protesting in favour of independence, continues to fester across Australia’s universities.

In the weeks following these protests, we have witnessed pro-Hong Kong Lennon boards across Australia’s university campuses, which offer messages of support in favour of independence, systematically torn down by Chinese students, as well as attempts by Chinese student groups to strongarm universities into suppressing pro-Hong Kong sentiments in order to provide a “clean and pure learning environment”.

There have also been ongoing reports of intimidation of Hong Kong students, as reported by Fairfax on Friday:

Students involved in pro-Hong Kong protests at Australian universities say they have been assaulted, filmed and threatened by Chinese students…

At Melbourne’s Monash University, organisers of a mobile “Lennon Wall” – a colourful noticeboard where pro-Hong Kong protesters put Post-it notes expressing their opinions anonymously – say students speaking Mandarin got up close to try to film their faces with the aim of finding out their identities.

…one participant of the protest had made a police report after she was recognised and tracked down on social media where she had been insulted and had received calls from unknown numbers.

But he said their main concern was for mainland Chinese students who participated in the demonstration.

“There are some Chinese students on our side and now they are trying to find out who they are and find their addresses in China. We are so concerned about their safety, we are worried when they go back to China something will happen”…

“When we we were making the wall we we were doing it at night, wearing masks, because we were scared,” one student involved said. It was torn down by students speaking Mandarin and caught on video.

Fear of repercussions kept them from holding more public demonstrations.

This follows last week’s revelation that the parents of a Chinese international student whom attended a pro-Hong Kong independence rally was threatened by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and warned of the potential consequences of political dissent:

“I was in the protest. When people were recording I was doing my best to hide my face or stay away from the crowd”, [the student said]…

But within days of the rally the student received a call from his mother in China to say the family had been approached by “a guest”.

His mother told him the authorities had issued a warning about engaging in “anti-China rhetoric” in Brisbane and warned him not to “join any events where people are gathered together”.

“As long as you do that, we can make sure you’re safe and we’re safe,” his mother told him.

She said the family had assured officials that their son was loyal to the Communist Party.

Australia’s has let the ‘wolf into the henhouse’ in its thirst for Chinese international students. There were 136,000 Chinese international students studying at Australia’s universities as at March 2019 – an increase of 619% over the past 15 years:

As shown above, Chinese dominate Australia’s international student trade, accounting for 38% of total international student market by number and around 40% by value.

The concern is that the Chinese Communist Party has extended its influence to Australia’s university campuses via its international student diaspora, and in the process has suppressed the freedoms of other university students.

These concerns have been made worse by the fact that the Chinese Consulate in Brisbane praised the “spontaneous patriotic” behaviour of the Chinese students that attacked the pro-Hong Kong protestors at the University of Queensland, along with the proliferation of China-backed Confucius Institutes operating on Australian university campuses. These Confucius Institutes are a fully funded subsidiary of China’s Ministry of Education, and under the contracts of these institutes, China is effectively permitted to dictate what is taught, thus allowing the CCP to spread propaganda and push a nationalist agenda at Australia’s universities.

These risk have also been noticed in the US, via Washington Post:

Beijing’s increasingly aggressive actions worry Australians, as they should. In a two-part documentary currently screening on Australian television, Stephen FitzGerald — who, in 1973, became Australia’s first ambassador to China and is one of the country’s leading Sinologists — labels China’s attitude toward its diaspora a “provocation.” FitzGerald believes that Beijing should back off — but also that Australia needs to do more to embrace its Chinese students, welcoming them into the freethinking world of Western universities and countering the isolation that many experience.

FitzGerald’s advice offers a clue to the measured response we need right now. Australians, in the end, must steer a difficult course: trying to avoid the dangers of naiveté without falling back into the anti-Asian sentiment of our early history. At the same time, Chinese ambitions are real, and often explicitly stated. Australia, and the world, will need more than luck to manage them.

Australia’s politicians must push back strongly against the CCP’s infiltration of Australia’s universities. Stephen Fizgerald has previously advised that Confucius Institutes should be pushed off campus. His warnings last year were stark, the ABC:

A former Australian ambassador to China says Beijing’s influence here might become a thornier problem for the Federal Government than the dispute over the South China Sea.

In a discussion paper for the high-powered China Matters conference, Stephen FitzGerald wrote that Beijing’s sway over ethnic Chinese communities in Australia was palpable and extended to “the surveillance, direction and at times coercion of Chinese students through [People’s Republic of China (PRC)]-directed or controlled student associations”.

Some of the activity in Australia was being “directed by the Propaganda Department of the CCP Central Committee, whose role in China is to police people’s adherence to the views of the Party State and enforce ‘correct’ thinking”, the paper said.

The former diplomat said what made China’s influence peddling exceptional was that it brought “Australian and Chinese national interests, and values, into direct contention, challenging fundamentals of our system like freedom of speech and the media and enquiry, and the very validity of our political system”.

He pointed to the flow of Chinese Government funds though universities, the media and political parties saying it was designed to “generate among Australians and the Australian government a broad, uncritical approval of China’s government and its foreign policies”.

“Embassy and consulate officials have become more open in fronting universities and other institutions to voice displeasure at particular actions or decisions, with the suggestion that ‘China’ will not be happy if these are not changed or reversed,” Professor FitzGerald said.

We need rules and enforcement to protect free speech on campus.

Leith van Onselen


    • Some of the embassy staff are bound to have kids.

      A friendly chat at their school. Maybe child services, AFP and some other random organisation to spin them out.

      “Is mummy/daddy mean to you?”

    • Those who foreshadowed an Asian invasion (read: Chinese) in the 1980s and 90s were mocked, derided and ostracised.

      Now here we have the fruits of three decade of ignorant progressivism and pragmatic neo-liberalism.

      A quite literal invasion of this country by the Chinese Communist Party, without so much as a weapon being fired on our shores.

      And all it required to silence the dissenters was fear of being labelled a racist. Who needs an army when well funded propaganda is just as effective.

  1. Uq feels like a foreign uni. Flooded with internationals. Most of whom do everything they can to hang out with anyone but the locals.

    The aust defence force is 50k? So we have 136k foreign chinese doing uni here?

  2. Complex Carbon Unit

    Yes and heavy footed ! Iv said this before , crush these brain washed bull ants get out the super strong ant killer, You need to hang around with Chinese for a few years to get an ideas of the true reality’s of their culture,
    Their are a few that are free from the indoctrination but they are the minority, they usually can’t stand the Chinese culture them selfs so and mostly have a lot of locals as friends, if you are a Chinese guy and do this you will be banished by the other brain washed bull ants, with Chinese girls it’s called being free, their parents free them from the culture and they ma have an Aussie boy friend it’s the minority to !!!!!

  3. Chinese students in Australia commiting acts of violence, why are they not being immediately deported, along with any Chinese consular officials (and their families) who have condoned this behaviour.

    • I believe we should apply whatever treatment would be meted out to us, should we do something similar in China. That is the system they are protecting so let them have a taste of what it is like over here.

  4. Personally I think we need to pick-our-fights.
    If this HK thingy is our line in the sand well and good, but if it’s just another position that we’ll surrender in a week or two when we find a more important cause-célèbre, than maybe we should decide what we (as in Australians) actually want and focus on that goal instead.

      • I don’t know, you tell me.
        Is it better to win one battle that you really care about or lose 100 battles that just couldn’t hold your interest?
        I know which approach I have respect for, and which I have nothing but contempt for.
        Sometimes it’s worth keeping in mind exactly how your adversary will view your failure.
        In GeoPolitics it is not as simple as how you see the outcome, more important is how others see the outcome and most important is how your adversary views the outcome.

    • Since when did Australia have a role in the “battle” for Hong Kong?

      Hong Kong is part of China.

      They have had 20 years to seek independence but have been quite happy making heaps of dough from being the interface with the west.

      If they are no longer happy with that then they need to do something about it and making it non-violent would be a very good choice.

      I can’t see any justification for anyone, especially the west, to get involved.

      If people want freedom doing it yourself is the best approach.

      The best option for the people of Hong Kong may be to avoid a confrontation with Beijing and just allow the resistance to bubble away at a moderate temperature. Small scale, hit and run non violent disturbances will annoy Beijing but are hard to do anything about.

      Beijing will fear a mainland infection of this rebelliousness and would love a good excuse for a crack down.

      Denying them that might be the real victory.

      • ErmingtonPlumbingMEMBER

        Agree,…Hong Kong is a dumb hill to die on, its their territory.
        Taiwan on the other hand has a US nuclear guarantee.
        That’ll be the real test.

  5. Complex Carbon Unit

    Quick get out the racist flag who wants to use it next against Aussie’s, they are gullible round eyes fools with big noses that pay to much tax !

  6. Stewie GriffinMEMBER

    This is great – this is Multiculturalism in action. The diversity of opinion that this represents means that Australia’s conversational narrative will become much more multifaceted, than the boring uniform homogeneity of Colonial Australian view point.

    This is what we want – more viewpoints to make our narrative stronger and more robust. The people in the EZFKA are trying to build a hybrid society and well frankly, we should be accepting of the political viewpoints of the new residents who we’ve fallen over ourselves to bring into the country.

    Tolerance of different cultural values means far more than simply accepting someones religious proclivities, or colourful clothes or spicy food – personally I think it is quite condescending, and perhaps a little bit racist, to suggest that these new residents to the EZFKA should have to abandon their own cultural values with regards to politics, simply because they’re now residing in our nation.

    • EZFKA laws are not made by parliament but by usage. The foreign takeover laws are disregarded here as having no application. Threats to cause injury to others no longer forms an offence under the Crimes Act. I don’t know why anyone would think cultural values should not be similarly affected. If vibrancy is in action then vibrancy is the culture. Simple really.

      • Stewie GriffinMEMBER

        It’s okay Fitz – it’ just dumbo aka Maggot, hiding out under another pseudonym.

        I sincerely doubt he’d have picked up the irony… he’s not the sharpest pencil in the box – if brains were dynamite he’d have trouble blowing his nose.

    • Stewie GriffinMEMBER

      The EZFKA thanks our wise leaders – from these multiple community narratives a stronger and more united EZFKA will emerge.