Franking credits debate degenerates into propaganda

Advertisement

By Leith van Onselen

The AFR has attacked “fake news” pertaining to Labor’s franking credit reforms by producing its own fake news claiming that Labor’s policy will “hurt the most vulnerable”:

Could there be a clearer example of fake news: repeating that tax wasn’t paid when clearly it was? This proposal amounts to the opposite of a ‘‘loophole’’. It is an ‘‘artifice’’ to raise the tax rate on company-sourced income. Confiscating this money from retirees (but not from other shareholders), while shifting the focus for unaffected voters – ‘‘anyway we will give the money to schools’’ – is sugar-coating discrimination between equivalent beneficial owners. It undermines property rights…

The reality is that a couple with the median fund could take the median income and just make it to the end of their 80s. Labor’s policy will reduce their income by 15-25 per cent and they will make it only to their mid-80s. The irony is that wealthier people with advisers will avoid all this…

The full text of this article is available to MacroBusiness subscribers

$1 for your first month, then:
Cancel at any time through our billing provider, Stripe
About the author
Leith van Onselen is Chief Economist at the MB Fund and MB Super. He is also a co-founder of MacroBusiness. Leith has previously worked at the Australian Treasury, Victorian Treasury and Goldman Sachs.