Paul Keating still dazed and confused on superannuation

Advertisement

By Leith van Onselen

Back in May, the architect of Australia’s compulsory superannuation system, Paul Keating, urged the federal government to raise Australia’s superannuation guarantee (i.e. compulsory superannuation contributions) from 9.5% to 12%, claiming it would compensate workers for productivity gains during a period of low wages growth.

At the time, I noted that Keating’s argument was non-sensical, given raising the superannuation guarantee would lower worker’s take home pay, given the cost of compulsory superannuation contributions unambiguously falls on the employee, not on the employer – as noted explicitly by the Henry Tax Review. It would also cost the Federal Budget another $2 billion a year, while heightening inequities already rife in the superannuation system.

The full text of this article is available to MacroBusiness subscribers

$1 for your first month, then:
Cancel at any time through our billing provider, Stripe
About the author
Leith van Onselen is Chief Economist at the MB Fund and MB Super. He is also a co-founder of MacroBusiness. Leith has previously worked at the Australian Treasury, Victorian Treasury and Goldman Sachs.