Paul Keating still dazed and confused on superannuation
Back in May, the architect of Australia’s compulsory superannuation system, Paul Keating, urged the federal government to raise Australia’s superannuation guarantee (i.e. compulsory superannuation contributions) from 9.5% to 12%, claiming it would compensate workers for productivity gains during a period of low wages growth.
At the time, I noted that Keating’s argument was non-sensical, given raising the superannuation guarantee would lower worker’s take home pay, given the cost of compulsory superannuation contributions unambiguously falls on the employee, not on the employer – as noted explicitly by the Henry Tax Review. It would also cost the Federal Budget another $2 billion a year, while heightening inequities already rife in the superannuation system.
The full text of this article is available to MacroBusiness subscribers
