Australian urbanisation looks a lot like Chinese central-planning

Advertisement

For a long time I have observed a plain historical truth. Colonial sub-altern economies and societies tend to reflect the structures and values of their hegemon. It happens through both coercion and willing submission for personal gain. This is clear throughout the history of colonialism. Indeed we need look no further than our own. First we were British. Then we were American. And now we’re becoming Chinese.

It was easier to adopt the trapping of the overlords with which we shared a cultural history. But that is only a difference in degree and time not kind. Today our economy is the most prominent example of the leading edge of the historical inertia that is still at work shaping us in our better’s image. It is already Chinese in all but name.

To understand the near completeness of the transformation, remember that the Australian economy operates on symbiotic halves. Our miners sell dirt to foreigners and our banks leverage that income in global markets to lend into huge domestic mortgages. When trouble strikes, the Federal Budget sits between them, taking in the commodity tax revenues, and guaranteeing the offshore borrowing of the banks.

The full text of this article is available to MacroBusiness subscribers

$1 for your first month, then:
Cancel at any time through our billing provider, Stripe
About the author
David Llewellyn-Smith is Chief Strategist at the MB Fund and MB Super. David is the founding publisher and editor of MacroBusiness and was the founding publisher and global economy editor of The Diplomat, the Asia Pacific’s leading geo-politics and economics portal. He is also a former gold trader and economic commentator at The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, the ABC and Business Spectator. He is the co-author of The Great Crash of 2008 with Ross Garnaut and was the editor of the second Garnaut Climate Change Review.