Saul Eslake slams demand-side housing policy stimulus

Advertisement

By Leith van Onselen

Economist Saul Eslake has told the Australian Securities & Investments Commission’s (ASIC) annual forum that policies aimed at helping residential investment – such as negative gearing and allowing self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) to borrow and invest in residential property – have helped contribute to housing unaffordability, as well as facilitated the accumulation of mortgage debt. From The AFR:

Allowing self-managed superannuation funds to borrow and invest in residential property was one of the “most redundant” policies introduced in Australia, …Saul Eslake says…

The full text of this article is available to MacroBusiness subscribers

$1 for your first month, then:
Cancel at any time through our billing provider, Stripe
About the author
Leith van Onselen is Chief Economist at the MB Fund and MB Super. He is also a co-founder of MacroBusiness. Leith has previously worked at the Australian Treasury, Victorian Treasury and Goldman Sachs.