Implications of the ‘Big Australia’ boilover

Advertisement

If you’re a pollie and think you can manage the current surge in angst about mass immigration then think again. The ‘cut immigration’ movement now has very serious momentum. Moreover, it is not being driven by demagoguery or ideas or anything else intangible. It is being driven by something that cannot be stopped: the lived experience of increasing congestion in eastern cities.

Remember that it was only a year ago that you could not mention this topic without being branded a “racist” across the media. As so often happens, once the lid was ripped off, the debate rushed out at explosive speed. Now the wowsers doing the branding are under siege. The ABC has been forced to cover the issue, and has been pushed to acknowledge that is has downsides. Traditional Left versus Right media divisions are also breaking down as experts cross boundaries.

Indeed, what is being exposed as the debate rages is just how thin the mass immigration arguments are. Higher house prices, lower wages and reduced living standards are obvious to everyone. The defenses against them are at best theoretical and more often than not deeply biased intellectually or financially.

The full text of this article is available to MacroBusiness subscribers

$1 for your first month, then:
Cancel at any time through our billing provider, Stripe
About the author
David Llewellyn-Smith is Chief Strategist at the MB Fund and MB Super. David is the founding publisher and editor of MacroBusiness and was the founding publisher and global economy editor of The Diplomat, the Asia Pacific’s leading geo-politics and economics portal. He is also a former gold trader and economic commentator at The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, the ABC and Business Spectator. He is the co-author of The Great Crash of 2008 with Ross Garnaut and was the editor of the second Garnaut Climate Change Review.