Turnbull’s big company tax cut mistake

Advertisement

From “Racism” Rob Burgess:

As reported recently, the reality is that the ‘effective’ tax rate for Australian companies is well below US company taxes, even after President Donald Trump slashed the headline rate from 35 to 21 per cent.

…For once, One Nation leader Pauline Hanson has got her economic ideas straight on this matter.

She correctly points out that a company’s tax windfall cannot be given to both shareholders and workers – that is, Treasurer Scott Morrison’s claim that the tax cut will boost wages is just plain wrong.

Economist and former Liberal Party leader John Hewson told me on Tuesday that in the current environment, he has no doubts about where that money would flow at a time when “corporate profits are at an all time high relative to GDP”.

“If you help them increase that profit even more, that is give them higher net profits, they will distribute it as dividends or buy back their own shares,” he said.

“They won’t hand it out as pay rises because [while underemployment persists] they are not competing for labour.”

The third reason the cuts are misguided is that the Australian economy is most in trouble on the consumption side, as economist and former Labor trade minister Craig Emerson pointed out in Tuesday’s Financial Review.

He argued that Australia’s record stock of mortgage debt is going to drain household budgets, even if the RBA does not raise rates, due to the one-third of mortgage funding sourced on global ‘wholesale’ markets – where rates are rising.

That, he says, will find households caught between “insipid wages growth” and “rising costs of their outstanding debt, [meaning] they inevitably will pull back on spending on other items”.

That is where the government ought to focus its tax reforms – at household level.

…That is why the PM’s renewed commitment to corporate tax cuts is such a mistake.

The economy is going to need stimulus on the consumption side, but any income tax cuts the government makes in the next budget will be small – simply because so much revenue is earmarked to be handed back to companies.

That gives Labor a free kick. It is opposing all tax cuts above the $50 million turnover threshold, and may even reduce that threshold in the tax plan it takes to the next election.

Sound analysis (for once).

About the author
David Llewellyn-Smith is Chief Strategist at the MB Fund and MB Super. David is the founding publisher and editor of MacroBusiness and was the founding publisher and global economy editor of The Diplomat, the Asia Pacific’s leading geo-politics and economics portal. He is also a former gold trader and economic commentator at The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, the ABC and Business Spectator. He is the co-author of The Great Crash of 2008 with Ross Garnaut and was the editor of the second Garnaut Climate Change Review.