APRA’s interest-only curbs a stomping success

Advertisement

By Leith van Onselen

CoreLogic’s Cameron Kusher has published some interesting charts showing how the Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority’s (APRA) macro-prudential curbs on interest-only lending have been a major success, driving interest-only lending to record low levels:

The total value of interest-only lending over the September 2017 quarter was $16.603 billion which was -44.8% lower than the value over the June 2017 quarter and -52.8% lower than it was a year ago. We have recently seen the implementation on the cap of new interest-only lending, limiting it to 30% of new mortgages. Over the September 2017 quarter, interest-only mortgages accounted for 16.9% of new mortgage lending which was the lowest proportion on record and well down on the 30.5% the previous quarter. It is a little surprising to see the proportion of lending to investors fall so much over the quarter, especially considering that the cap is 30%. This potentially indicates that the higher mortgage rates being incurred by interest-only borrowers are actually curtailing demand more so than the cap.

The changes to macroprudential policies has resulted in (not-surprisingly) more prudent borrowing. As a result there has been an ongoing decline in new mortgages being written on high loan to valuation ratios (LVRs). Over the quarter, $6.676 billion in mortgages were for LVRs above 90%. Based on this figure, the value of mortgages on LVRs above 90% was -2.3% lower over the quarter, -13.3% lower over the year and it was the lowest quarterly value of mortgages greater than 90% LVR since March 2011. Over the quarter, the value of mortgages with an LVR of between 80% and 90% was $13.547 billion which was -4.1% lower over the quarter but 3.6% higher year-on-year. Over the September 2017 quarter, an historic low 20.6% of new mortgages had an LVR greater than 80%.

Clearly, APRA’s macro-prudential controls on lending have worked. Shame APRA didn’t implement them early in the housing cycle, rather than well after the horse had bolted.

[email protected]

Advertisement
About the author
Leith van Onselen is Chief Economist at the MB Fund and MB Super. He is also a co-founder of MacroBusiness. Leith has previously worked at the Australian Treasury, Victorian Treasury and Goldman Sachs.