US debates total LNG export freedom


From LNGWorldNews:

U.S. Subcommittee on Energy and Power examined H.R. 6, the Domestic Prosperity and Global Freedom Act. The bill will accelerate approvals of U.S. LNG exports to American allies.

The legislation facilitates automatic approvals of all export applications that have been noticed in the Federal Register and modifies the process moving forward so that exports to U.S. allies are no longer subject to unnecessary delays. For future export applications, the legislation would shift the benchmark for expedited review from Free Trade Agreement (FTA) countries to World Trade Organization (WTO) members. To date, this administration has approved seven export applications, while at least 24 applications are still awaiting action.

“While the world waits for natural gas from America, a backlog of applications to export languishes at the Department of Energy. H.R. 6 cuts the red tape, approves the pending applications, and provides future applicants with a much more reasonable process,” said Chairman Ed Whitfield“Geopolitics is not the only issue. Experts have indicated the reasonable export of LNG will stimulate our economy and reduce the nation’s trade deficit.”

The crisis in Ukraine and Russia’s continued aggression has brought increased attention to the need for faster LNG export approvals to increase global energy supplies and competition. “The near monopolistic control Russia has on the LNG market in Europe has given them immense power and reforming the LNG export process would send an immediate signal to the rest of the world that would help check Russia’s aggression. Aside from its natural gas and oil production and exports, Russia has a third world economy that is no match for our industrial know-how and ingenuity. It is this American ingenuity that discovered there is enough natural gas to use domestically, and export to our allies across the globe,” said Rep.Cory Gardner.

Hungarian Ambassador-at-Large for Energy Security Anita Orban explained how U.S. LNG exports would help liberate Central and Eastern European countries from Russia’s control by offering an alternative source of energy. She stated that allowing LNG exports “would immediately change the business calculus of infrastructure investments and send an extremely important message of strategic reassurance to the region which currently feels more threatened than any time since the Cold War… In short, by liberalizing LNG exports, by eliminating the legal and administrative obstacles to the free trading of this vital, domestically produced commodity, the United States would provide fast and long-lasting protection for its allies against the most important dangers of natural gas dependency.”

Former member of Congress and Chairman of the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization James Bacchus explained that DOE’s current restrictions on LNG exports violate WTO trade rules. “Fortunately, HR 6, introduced by Congressman Cory Gardner of Colorado, and currently under consideration by this Committee, would eliminate this potential legal concern by providing that natural gas exports to all other members of the WTO would be deemed to be in the ‘public interest,” said Bacchus.

Witnesses also explained the benefits LNG exports would bring to the domestic economy. A study conducted in 2012 for the Department of Energy by NERA Economic Consulting concluded LNG exports would result in net benefits to the American economy. An updated analysis was completed earlier this month, and results showed that the economic benefits and job gains from LNG exports were even greater than initially expected. W. David Montgomery, Senior Vice President at NERA Economic Consulting, testified today on NERA’s conclusions, stating,“We found no sweet spot that would justify government interference with our obligations under the WTO to allow free trade in commodities like natural gas. In every scenario we investigated, higher levels of LNG exports led to larger economic benefits to the U.S.”

Rep. Gardner questioned DOE Deputy Assistant Secretary for Oil and Natural Gas Paula Gant about the positive impacts of LNG exports on American job creation and energy security.

Full committee Chairman Fred Upton concluded, “Overall, U.S. natural gas exports truly offer a win-win scenario. The U.S. has the chance to sell a product we have in abundance and other nations need, and at the same time provide a lifeline to our allies in that region for many years to come. I look forward to working with Cory Gardner and all of my colleagues to see H.R. 6 become law.”

I don’t expect this go anywhere (though I’m no expert on the politics) given the US Department of Energy plays a key role in balancing energy and manufacturing interests. But it does appear that the Crimean situation has tilted the playing field towards further gas export approvals for North Asia and Europe.

David Llewellyn-Smith
Latest posts by David Llewellyn-Smith (see all)


  1. On the other hand…

    “recent analysis by Energy Aspects [shows] 6 years of progressively worsening financial performance by 35 independent companies focused on shale gas and tight oil plays in the US.” This worsening financial performance comes despite production growth and a general shift of drilling activity away from dry gas and toward higher-profit liquids (crude and NGLs) since 2010.

    Oil & Gas Journal cites analysis by Ivan Sandrea, an OIES research associate and senior partner of Ernst & Young London, suggesting that, “Unless financial performances improve, capital markets won’t support the continuous drilling needed to sustain production from unconventional resource plays.” Sandrea forecasts that “Parts of the industry will have to restructure and focus more rapidly on the most commercially sustainable areas of the plays, perhaps about 40% of the current acreage and resource estimates. . . .”

    • notsofastMEMBER

      The problems with profitability of companies chasing dry shale gas are well known but the tight oil plays are meant to be profitable in the $90-$100US per barrel range with the associated gas helping to keep natural gas prices down. But I guess it wouldn’t surprise me if there was some hidden subsidies flowing to these tight play oil companies to help them to be profitable at this price so they can kick start the tight oil revolution in the US, even as many conventional oil fields continue to decline.

      Ultimately though, I see oil prices of $150 per barrel will see the tight oil revolution be profitable globally potentially providing another decade of increasing oil supply.

  2. too right johnyaku. The depletion rates of the gas fields is extreme. And too costly to keep expanding. Energy independence for the US is only ever going to be dream.