Work Choices bangs at the back door

Advertisement
imgres

From The Australian today:

In a submission to the [Fair Work] commission’s major review of modern awards, the government says the tribunal should carefully consider the “softening economic environment and labour market”, and, in particular, the impact of employment costs on companies deciding to hire workers over the next four years.

…”The government submits that four-yearly reviews are to be a comprehensive examination of the minimum terms and conditions of employment in modern awards, and their relevance to modern workplaces,” the submission says.

“The four-yearly reviews are also an opportunity to realign or disamalgamate awards where necessary. The government acknowledges the potential for significant changes to modern awards to occur as a result of this review.”

The government says the commission is responsible for determining whether additional remuneration including penalty rates and the hours and days in which it was provided in modern awards are “appropriate in a particular industry”.

Restricting the number of “allowable matters” under the award system was one of the three key planks in the Work Choices legislation. The others two were restricting union powers of access and protest and eliminating unfair dismissal laws.

About the author
David Llewellyn-Smith is Chief Strategist at the MB Fund and MB Super. David is the founding publisher and editor of MacroBusiness and was the founding publisher and global economy editor of The Diplomat, the Asia Pacific's leading geo-politics and economics portal. He is also a former gold trader and economic commentator at The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, the ABC and Business Spectator. He is the co-author of The Great Crash of 2008 with Ross Garnaut and was the editor of the second Garnaut Climate Change Review.
Advertisement