Roger Montgomery: Techincal analysis is rubbish

Advertisement

Our Rodge has this week posted a spray at technical analysis, describing it as ‘rubbish”. I wish he hadn’t.

In my experience technical analysis works extraordinarily well. I know chaps who make a very hansom living using nothing else.

The secret is that these same fellows never tell anyone that they do it. On the contrary, they weave elaborate tales of macro insights and value formulae to disguise the fact that they using technicals.

Advertisement

They are forced to behave in this way because fundamental analysts like Roger Montgomery have been so successful in spinning their own myths about value investing. Despite there’s being little evidence that active value investing does any better than indexing, and plenty of evidence that shares just take a random walk, chaps like our Rodge trade on their expertise.

I’m no technician myself but I know empirically that technicals are a very valuable tool for investors who understand it. Finding yourself a quant savant to wield this tool will do you know harm at all.

Conversely, listening to Roger on this occasion quite possibly will.

Advertisement
About the author
David Llewellyn-Smith is Chief Strategist at the MB Fund and MB Super. David is the founding publisher and editor of MacroBusiness and was the founding publisher and global economy editor of The Diplomat, the Asia Pacific's leading geo-politics and economics portal. He is also a former gold trader and economic commentator at The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, the ABC and Business Spectator. He is the co-author of The Great Crash of 2008 with Ross Garnaut and was the editor of the second Garnaut Climate Change Review.
Advertisement