Japan piles into US gas

imgres

The Australian LNG boom is under outright attack. From The Australian:

THE drift of big Japanese buyers of liquefied natural gas towards US shale gas has continued after Tokyo Electric Power Company finalised plans to increase its US gas imports by 50 per cent.

…Japan’s Yomiuri Shimbun says TEPCO predicts the move will save it more than Y=10 billion ($106 million) a year when imports begin in 2017 as it increases shale gas imports from 0.8 million tonnes per annum to 1.2mtpa.

However, the estimates are thought be based on a 30 per cent saving in purchasing US gas, priced in line with Henry Hub prices, compared with conventional gas, priced according to the oil price. Those estimates put the average price of landed gas in Tokyo at $17 per million British thermal units, and that of shale gas imports at $12.

Australian producers acknowledge the potential risk to them posed by the shale gas revolution but don’t believe the volumes Japan will be able to import will enable it to achieve its goal of ending oil-linked pricing for Asian LNG sales.

Keep saying that to yourselves fellas and maybe the problem will go away. Then again, it appears to me that Japan has already succeeded in breaking oil-linked pricing. If it hadn’t we’d be getting more investment. The pricing formula for the recent Wheatstone deal was also mysteriously kept under wraps. Recall that $12 is the break even point for Australia’s entire wave of LNG plants so our oil-linked price projects are at the wrong end of the cost curve. That means existing contracts should hold but that they’ll be under perpetual pressure for renegotiation. It also means new projects are off the agenda unless costs come down enough to not require the oil-link.

Meanwhile, find below a new corporate video from BG Group on the progress on QCLNG, which gives you some idea of the magnitude of the Curtis Island LNG precinct, which is getting ready to pump very expensive gas:

Comments

  1. Plenty of technology on display there, and plenty of guys standing around..consulting.
    When BG has the operation and maintenance manuals written for the project they need to ensure there is a section on how to dis assemble the plant and relocate it to a location where the extraction of CSG wont ruin the environment. WW

  2. Yeah well we’ll see. Quatar and IEA also have doubts

    ‘The IEA said then that a competitive natural gas market and reliable gas prices will not develop overnight, and will not necessarily lead to low prices. But it would allow participants in the Asia-Pacific region to “increase portfolio flexibility” in line with maturing gas markets, it added.’

    Quatar thinks development of at least five North American plants in jeopardy and that remaining NA supply will be insufficient.

    Existing, under construction and planned gas facilities globally, interesting

    http://www.globallnginfo.com/World%20LNG%20Plants%20&%20Terminals.pdf

    And the paper that kick started Japan’s activity?

    http://eneken.ieej.or.jp/data/4703.pdf