Farmers back grocery Tsar

Advertisement

The National Farmers Federation has backed calls for a “Grocery Tsar” to prevent market abuses by the supermarkets oligopoly. Here’s the press release (not be confused with “stories” that are just the press release that you’ll find in the MSM) :

The National Farmers’ Federation (NFF) has renewed calls for the introduction of a mandatory code of conduct for supermarkets, aimed at preventing a misuse of market power.

NFF President Jock Laurie said the NFF had worked with the major retailers and the Australian Food and Grocery Council (AFGC) in good faith to develop a voluntary code, but had lost confidence that it could go far enough in protecting farmers’ interests.

“Australia has an extremely concentrated supermarket retail sector, which risks an abuse of power by the supermarkets over their suppliers. The primary purpose of a code, either voluntary or mandatory, is to ensure the retailers do not misuse their market power,” Mr Laurie said.

“As such, our position has always been to support a mandatory code and longer-term changes to competition and consumer law, but to first see if the same outcomes can be achieved on a voluntary basis, and we have been working towards this with both retailers and the AFGC.

“After some months of discussion, we lack confidence that the voluntary code can deliver the strong outcomes that farmers expect – which is why we are calling on the Federal Government to work with us to deliver a sensible mandatory code.

“This means the Government immediately commencing a process that clearly identifies the issues throughout the sector, and finds adequate ways to address them.

“From our initial viewpoint, any mandatory code could include measures to safeguard against a misuse of power between all the major retailers and suppliers; address concerns around contract negotiations between farmers and retailers; and provide an avenue for dispute resolution, including a confidential complaint process and an independent dispute resolution mechanism through an ombudsman or commissioner.

“And it must be done in a way that does not add unnecessary costs into the agricultural supply chain. Farmers are price takers, so it is essential that any additional costs are not passed on to farmers.

“Importantly, we will only support a mandatory code that has real teeth; that is able to identify areas of concern to farmers and address these. This would include appropriate penalties.

“We also call on the Government to make changes to the Competition and Consumer Act to ensure a more balanced supply-chain approach in the long-term – ensuring that the rights of farmers are balanced more equally with those of consumers and retailers.

“At the moment, farmers are left exposed, which is why our members have strongly called for Government action,” Mr Laurie said.

For those that are surprised by this, don’t be. The NFF has a long and proud history of protectionism, which is one of the reasons the Nationals coalition with the Liberal Party is so weird.

Advertisement

If they’re up for it, I can’t see why it shouldn’t go ahead. The oligopoly is plainly obvious and needs some form of control. Nonetheless, it’s a great shame that industry concentration was ever allowed to come to this. It would be far preferable to have folks simple competing.

About the author
David Llewellyn-Smith is Chief Strategist at the MB Fund and MB Super. David is the founding publisher and editor of MacroBusiness and was the founding publisher and global economy editor of The Diplomat, the Asia Pacific’s leading geo-politics and economics portal. He is also a former gold trader and economic commentator at The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, the ABC and Business Spectator. He is the co-author of The Great Crash of 2008 with Ross Garnaut and was the editor of the second Garnaut Climate Change Review.