R&D changes: Policy short-termism at its best

Front page of the AFR today:

Sorry – no R&D grants because we need the money so that we can give tax cuts to companies so that they can spend more on R&D (disclaimer: more R&D will only occur if there is enough cash is left after paying higher dividends, performing more buybacks and awarding managers bigger bonuses).

I don’t want to lose track of the fact that there is some good policy at the heart of this – i.e. changes in R&D grants to reduce payments to companies that were gaming the system:

The budget changes reduced the premium tax break for companies that spend less than 2 per cent of total expenditures on R&D to 4 per cent from 8.5 per cent, but increased it on a sliding scale to 12.5 per cent for “high intensity” companies that spend more than 10 per cent of expenditures on R&D.

The R&D review was part of the Turnbull government’s wider innovation agenda designed to boost business R&D spending and commercialisation of research – which are low by global standards – to create another engine of economic growth.

But rather than take the money saved from the companies that were gaming the system and use it to generate more R&D, the government has banked the savings.

Net effect: the government’s goal is to boost R&D spending, but they are going to spend less on R&D. No explanation of the disconnect was provided.

Follow me

Damien Klassen

Damien has a wealth of experience across international equities (Schroders), asset allocation (Wilson HTM) and he helped create one of Australia’s largest independent research firms, Aegis Equities. He lectured for over a decade at the Securities Institute, Finsia and Kaplan and spent many of those years as the external Chair for the subject of Industrial Equity Analysis.
Follow me

Latest posts by Damien Klassen (see all)

Comments are hidden for Membership Subscribers only.