Are markets pricing QE4?

Advertisement

Are markets pricing for QE4? That’s the only way to make sense of today’s bizarro action. The US dollar eased:

tvc_66512d5986dba5d948b9afab1d71f245

Yen and euro were flat:

tvc_28a4df747dc461146022247c297fcc10

Commodity currencies were mostly firmer:

Advertisement
tvc_da81f2f7697b9c122056e5d860536dd4

The Chinese yuan sank on rumours the PBOC is targeting lower:

tvc_7d9d0b40b0a2a73e6aaa830bea41a45b

Gold was firm:

Advertisement
tvc_e557f1f6f9fee05c2b5f2e8677af550e

Oil was whacked:

tvc_989113d9e74308b8255558dccb182bce

Base metals flew:

tvc_e276f42ad97917749df0c32d32a7bdf6

So did big miners:

Advertisement
tvc_83635a9c441ff9d41088fa76680e8c01

EM and US high yield debt broke out despite oil:

tvc_4438c5a6013680502e42060d8b50038c

Stocks roared:

Advertisement
tvc_46b4a53f351a2a45742987f38051b70a

Bonds yields crashed:

tvc_ddf88eb4d372f15f5ba7422a4afa72b5

That’s about as close to nonsensical market action as I can recall. Stocks have forgotten Brexit or are so confident of stimulus that they’r rising anyway. But have moved so far, so fast that it is no longer necessary anyway. Bonds are very bearish. Commodities are flying even though China is slowing and yuan tumbling meaning less need for imported commodities. Yet oil wanted no part in it even as high yield credit was heavily bid.

The only way to make any sense of this action is that markets are pricing for QE4, though gold and oil weigh against that. Or, or course, it is just a night of nonsense!

Advertisement

The news flow was certainly that with Boris Johnson bailing from the UK PM race, Italy demanding bank bailouts, China rumours about a weaker yuan, S&P downgrading the EU, BOE signaling more easing, IMF warning on EU and UK growth and the ECB warning it is running out of stuff to buy.

Let’s leave it with JPM:

Market update – the SPX opened flat-to-up small but caught a lift around ~10:30amET, around the time DJ reported on a MDLZ bid for HSY (which would be a >$20B deal) and this WSJ Italian bank article hit (http://goo.gl/R6UccS), while Carney’s prediction of BOE easing later this summer isn’t hurting (although the BOE was widely expected to enhance accommodation in the coming months). Also at 12pmET Bloomberg reported on how the ECB was considering easing its QE criteria to account for the expanded pool of bonds w/yields below the deposit rate. Beneath the surface sentiment is increasingly cautious, with most investors anticipating the resumption of selling once we get past month/quarter-end (nearly no one thinks stocks will get off “this easy” from the referendum decision last week). Other than the MDLZ/HSY news, Italian bank noise, and the Carney remarks,narrative-shifting news was pretty minimal over the last 12-18 hours. The UK political dynamics are interesting but Boris Johnson wasn’t the PM front-runner even before today and regardless it will likely be a few more weeks at least before the next British leader is known (and the triggering of Article 50, if it comes at all, won’t occur until 2017 at the earliest). The China CNY Reuters article created initial anxiety (as CNY depreciation was the catalyst behind the Aug and Jan/Feb swoons) but stocks (esp. in the US) seem less sensitive to this topic (the issue isn’t so much the absolute CNY level but instead pace and this is something China’s leadership appears to now appreciate).

About the author
David Llewellyn-Smith is Chief Strategist at the MB Fund and MB Super. David is the founding publisher and editor of MacroBusiness and was the founding publisher and global economy editor of The Diplomat, the Asia Pacific’s leading geo-politics and economics portal. He is also a former gold trader and economic commentator at The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, the ABC and Business Spectator. He is the co-author of The Great Crash of 2008 with Ross Garnaut and was the editor of the second Garnaut Climate Change Review.