Shorten reaffirms 50% renewables target

Advertisement

From Reneweconomy:

Opposition leader Bill Shorten has accused the Coalition government of policy vandalism on energy, and committed to an emissions intensity scheme that he insists will deliver Labor’s target of 50 per cent renewables in the country’s electricity system by 2030.

In a landmark speech at the Bloomberg headquarters in Sydney on Thursday, Shorten said Australia should be the “energy capital of Asia”, echoing former government advisor Ross Garnaut’s pitch that the country should become a “renewable energy powerhouse.”

Shorten – in a hastily arranged speech designed to re-frame the energy debate and regain the initiative after losing focus and being outmanoeuvred in the past week – outlined why Australia should be focusing on wind, solar and storage technologies rather than a misnomer like “clean coal.”

Labor, it seems, is realising that – with the strong support of public opinion – its commitment to renewable energy should be a vote winner, and the means to deliver cleaner, cheaper and more reliable power.

That approach is being underpinned by the falling cost of solar, in particular, the emergence of battery storage, reports from the CSIRO and others that underpin the cost benefits of renewable energy, and the repeated failure of fossil fuel generation in critical events such as storms and heatwaves.

And, Labor hopes, its commitment to renewables will draw a clear line of difference between it and the Coalition, which Shorten said was “betting the bank on dirty, unaffordable technology.”

“Gambling on our energy future with clean coal is like punting on last year’s grand final today and picking the losing team,” Shorten said of Coalition’s commitment to building new coal-fired power stations.

 “In the renewable jobs and investment race – Australia has got a dream barrier draw. We are the world’s sunniest continent, one of the windiest places on earth and our universities, research centres and firms keep producing leaders in the field.”

Shorten was savage on the Coalition’s policy position, its support of “clean coal”, its opportunism on blackouts, its “policy vandalism” and the apparent complete about-face by Malcolm Turnbull on climate and clean energy policies.

He insisted the 50 per cent renewables target – which he admitted had been variously described as a “goal, target”, “objective” or “aspiration” – is “what we want Australia to achieve” and “2030 is when we want to get there.”

He also insisted that the $48 billion capital cost estimate by Bloomberg New Energy Finance to reach that figure was not a cost, but an “investment” that would create new industries and jobs.

It is understood that the speech was arranged following confusion over Labor’s policy last week, after a series of ill-fated interviews, and an internal decision to distinguish its policies from the Coalition by focusing on the technology and economics, as well as the climate issue.

This is what Shorten did well in his speech, pointing to the tumbling of more than 400 climate records, the need to reach the Paris climate targets, the lack of investment because of policy uncertainty, the benefits of investing in wind and solar, and the need to amend energy market rules to ensure renewables can be integrated.

“We didn’t need the blackouts to know that policies need to be changed,” he said.

The big question, however, is how a Labor government would achieve its 50 per cent renewable energy target by 2030, given that it is relying on an emissions intensity scheme as its primary policy mechanism – and Shorten made clear that the target would not be legislated.

That means the effective end of the renewable energy target mechanism in 2020, and the reliance on an EIS and possibly other mechanisms, such as state-based targets or reverse auctions.

Modelling done on behalf of the Australian Energy Markets Commission (by Frontier Economics) and the Climate Change Authority (Jacobs) indicates an EIS would deliver little in the way of new renewables by 2030, and maybe around 30 per cent at best.

Shorten mentioned the need to use ARENA and the CEFC to continue investment in new technologies, and to change the focus of the National Energy Market rules (at least so it takes environment and climate into account).

More here.

This may play well with the climate change faithful but he’ll need a rock solid commitment to defensible policy mechanisms as the Coalition climate wrecking ball swings. An EIS that promotes gas is a disaster waiting to happen unless you first break the east coast gas cartel. And do you want to fighting that cartel going into the election as well?

Advertisement
About the author
David Llewellyn-Smith is Chief Strategist at the MB Fund and MB Super. David is the founding publisher and editor of MacroBusiness and was the founding publisher and global economy editor of The Diplomat, the Asia Pacific’s leading geo-politics and economics portal. He is also a former gold trader and economic commentator at The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, the ABC and Business Spectator. He is the co-author of The Great Crash of 2008 with Ross Garnaut and was the editor of the second Garnaut Climate Change Review.