Economists measure China’s hard landing

Advertisement

From the WSJ:

EI-CM630_OUTLOO_16U_20150426135409

When China released its tabulation of first-quarter growth earlier this month, the 7% figure—the worst in six years—stirred fears of a deepening slowdown.

It also raised fresh doubt about the trustworthiness of China’s own statistics.

“Growth Likely Overstated,” said a Citibank report, concluding that actual quarterly growth could be below 6% year to year, depending on the factors weighed. Other research firms put their numbers far lower, with Capital Economics pegging the quarter at 4.9%, the Conference Board’s China Center at 4% and Lombard Street Research at 3.8%.

All of these are well within what a few years again would have been considered a Chinese “hard landing”. The phrase first became de rigueur in 2010/11 when China was screaming along at 12% growth. The definition has shifted as China’s glide slope has descended and now it seems anything above zero is no longer considered bumpy.

However you describe it, the effects remains the same; crashing commodity prices.

Advertisement
About the author
David Llewellyn-Smith is Chief Strategist at the MB Fund and MB Super. David is the founding publisher and editor of MacroBusiness and was the founding publisher and global economy editor of The Diplomat, the Asia Pacific’s leading geo-politics and economics portal. He is also a former gold trader and economic commentator at The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, the ABC and Business Spectator. He is the co-author of The Great Crash of 2008 with Ross Garnaut and was the editor of the second Garnaut Climate Change Review.