Foreign influence law nets Confucion Institutes

Advertisement

Bravo. Via Domain:

The Confucius Institute cultural and language education centres have received letters from the Attorney-General’s Department, alerting them to the introduction of the transparency regime, one of the measures put in place by the government in a bid to crack down on foreign interference and influence in Australia.

…Some other university-based facilities have voluntarily registered under the scheme, with the Perth USAsia Centre at the University of Western Australia and the United States Studies Centre at the University of Sydney lodging their relationships with foreign governments.

…”UTS does not consider any of its activities, including those of ACRI, to be registrable under the Foreign Influence Transparency Scheme, but will continue to monitor this over time,” said a spokesman.

If there is one single institute in the country that must register it is the super-uber-mega Chinese bull ACRI. As eminent Sinologist Stephen Fitzgerald has previous argued at the ABC:

In an exclusive interview, Australia’s first ambassador to China has raised the alarm about China’s influence in the higher education sector.

Stephen Fitzgerald singled out Bob Carr’s Australia China Relations Institute for particular criticism, saying universities need clear firewalls between donations and research.

ACRI, part of the University of Technology Sydney, was established with a large donation from the Chinese businessman Huang Xiangmo.

Mr Huang was the donor at the centre of the controversy surrounding Labor senator Sam Dastyari.

“I wouldn’t have taken the funding,” Mr Fitzgerald told Background Briefing.

“This is one of the really difficult issues about what is happening at the moment, because you don’t want to say no to all Chinese money.

“That would be ridiculous, self defeating, but you have to put firewalls between the donation and the way it is spent, and you have to be certain about the origins of that money.”

The director of ACRI, former foreign minister Bob Carr, said he disagreed.

“[This criticism] is coming from people on the cold warrior fringe of the Australian politics, people who are resentful of any hint of Australia running a pragmatic national interest-based China policy,” he said.

“There are two standards being applied here.”

As well as ACRI, hundreds of other language and culture centres have been established on campuses worldwide through confidential agreements between universities and the Chinese education ministry.

Mr Fitzgerald said he believed these centres, known as Confucius institutes, had no place in Australian higher education institutions.

“I just don’t think they should be in universities,” he said.

“Have them in Australia by all means; have them all over the country. I’d welcome them, but I don’t think they should be in universities.”

Advertisement

Register or prosecute.

About the author
David Llewellyn-Smith is Chief Strategist at the MB Fund and MB Super. David is the founding publisher and editor of MacroBusiness and was the founding publisher and global economy editor of The Diplomat, the Asia Pacific’s leading geo-politics and economics portal. He is also a former gold trader and economic commentator at The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, the ABC and Business Spectator. He is the co-author of The Great Crash of 2008 with Ross Garnaut and was the editor of the second Garnaut Climate Change Review.